Fair point. The reason I wrote it that way is because they basically took The Times story and repackaged it. But yes, a distinction worth making.
Thanks,
Stevie
On 12 November 2012 17:25, David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
On 12 November 2012 16:59, Stevie Benton stevie.benton@wikimedia.org.uk wrote:
Wikimedia UK has just published a blog post giving its response to
today's news stories in The Times and The Daily Telegraph about paid editing of Wikipedia.
You can see the blog post at http://bit.ly/ZfSaln but the full content
is below.
I wouldn't say the Telegraph "republished" the Times story - that implies a reprint or licensed copy - though it's clear they just worked straight from it. Possibly "also ran the story".
- d.
Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediauk-l@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org