It is for such concerns that I have suggested a limit on guarantor members, say to 75 or 100 people, all reviewed by the board, and open membership for the "Friends of WMUK 2.0" with no review.
Why should only the first 100 people get to have any say in the running of the chapter?
At 22:22 +0000 29/11/08, Thomas Dalton wrote:
It is for such concerns that I have suggested a limit on guarantor members, say to 75 or 100 people, all reviewed by the board, and open membership for the "Friends of WMUK 2.0" with no review.
Why should only the first 100 people get to have any say in the running of the chapter?
They will have a say, at the AGM, or an SGM, only. The Board runs the Company.
Also, look forwards a decade? Many of the "first 100" will have left by then, and it will be important to maintain a stable body.
Gordo
wikimediauk-l@lists.wikimedia.org