Tom et al,
I agree - your analysis is spot on in my opinion. This is why we should
keep the discussion going, find a space on (a) wiki to collect all the ideas
/ thoughts / proposals and then bring out a burner proposal!
Ian
2008/7/29 Tom Holden <thomas.holden(a)gmail.com>
I don't think that's an option. Just look at
the distribution of bids:
with 4+ pages from Europe (France are also considering multiple cities), 1
from the Americas (Rio, which hasn't got a chance in hell after Buenos
Aries) and one from Asia/Pacific (Melbourne).
There's a pretty strong impression that this is Europe's year. If we lose
then to Amsterdam or Stockholm (the most advanced bids by the look of it) we
will be out of contention for at least another 3 years. Melbourne also has a
shot on the continental rotation (which I presume is why Al has decided to
support them... hmm...) but even if they won we probably wouldn't have a
shot the next year as I imagine they wouldn't want to give it to two English
speaking countries in a row. (And if they were prepared to do this I would
imagine there would be some pretty tough competition from the US.)
So let's act as if this is our one shot. If by some miracle Rio wins then
at that point we can think about going again, until then if you want to see
Wikimania in the UK in the next few years I'd recommend you to do all you
can to help our 2010 bid win.
Tom
*From:* wikimediauk-l-bounces(a)lists.wikimedia.org [mailto:
wikimediauk-l-bounces(a)lists.wikimedia.org] *On Behalf Of *joseph seddon
*Sent:* 29 July 2008 12:06
*To:* wikimediauk-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
*Subject:* Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Oxford: new venue?
There is one option which to be honest i don't think many will agree but
thought id throw it into the pot. At this moment in
time we have around 3 months to get everything sorted as i believe and
although we have got alot of momentum, Im
wondering whether its worth perhaps thinking about a 2011 bid and giving
ourselves more time to thoroughly think this
through and get ourselves organised. What we could do is to continue what
we are doing but to use 2010 more as a proof
of concept as i doubt that with WMUK not having charity status we are going
to struggle to get the vast amounts of
sponsorship we need. I know this is a little defeatist but I just think
that id rather wait a year to put in a bid that is solid
and well thought through than trying to rush to get one in. Please feel
free to use the clue stick :)
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 23:30:46 +0100
From: martinp23(a)googlemail.com
To: peterc(a)cix.compulink.co.uk; wikimediauk-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Oxford: new venue?
2008/7/28 Peter Cohen <peterc(a)cix.compulink.co.uk>uk>:
> In-Reply-To: <
a4359dff0807281452y4c39a617ua92a135098ffc775(a)mail.gmail.com>
>> > Is there a reason that people are
going for university facilities
>> > and not
>> > hotels? Science Fiction Conventions tend to be hotel based.
>>
>> Do Sci Fi conventions generally have talks aimed at groups of 500
>> people? I don't think hotels can accommodate such large
>> conferences.
>
> This year's Easter Science Fiction convention was at the Radisson
> Edwardian Heathrow which has two conference suites that could be built
to
to
> the Radisson.
>
> Recent Easter SF cons have been at hotels in Chester, Hinckley,
Glasgow,
Liverpool
(but shall I say that I was not surprised that one of the MOD
missing computers was stolen from a room in the Liverpool Adelphi). The
Brighton Metropole had a big conferencing area in the rear, but the
management and the SF community fell out in the late 80s and we haven't
been back since.
There's an association of conferencing facilities (or there was in the
1980s who you could write to with your specs and they would put your
details in a circular to members.)
Cheap dig at Liverpool there :(.
But back to the point, I think there could be some merit in
investigating non-University approaches. During the Summer Hols, they
really are out to make as much money as they can with conferencing.
We may be able to find something a little cheaper by thinking outside
this box - I'm slightly amazed that the Alexandria team got all that
they did for free, though I do suspect that with some effort we may be
able to get close...
That said, I personally lack ideas at the moment... It is worth
keeping our eyes and minds open though.
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediauk-l(a)wikimedia.org
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_UK
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
------------------------------
Win £3000 to spend on whatever you want at Uni! Click here to
WIN!<http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/101719803/direct/01/>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediauk-l(a)wikimedia.org
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_UK
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l