The single biggest problem, Michael, is that when one talks in the
abstract, we end up chasing illusory problems that don't actually have any
impact. It's very difficult to create systems that are always 100%
accessible by all if we start by trying to second-guess what accessibility
problems visitors might encounter.
What we need is a well-advertised "clearing centre" where anybody who
experiences an accessibility problem on one of our sites can register their
problem, which would then allow us to examine it and provide the most
effective solution.
I'm quite happy to continue giving advice on the issues covered at
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Accessibility
and I'd like to see it adopted as default on the WMUK Wiki, but I question
the value of volunteers re-inventing the wheel by chasing "gaps" that I'm
not at all sure actually exist.
--
Doug
On 15 January 2014 11:08, Michael Maggs
michael@maggs.name wrote:
> Can WMUK collaborate with WMDE (and others) on this to push it forward?
> Obviously a lot of good work has already been done, but perhaps it now
> needs some long term commitment and leadership to ensure that what has been
> done is made easily accessible, and to work on filling gaps in
> functionality (covering all aspects of disability).
>
> Michael
>
> WMUK Chair
>
> > On 15 Jan 2014, at 09:34, Jon Davies
jon.davies@wikimedia.org.uk
> wrote:
> >
> > How about starting with what a 'ULS' is? That would help :)
> >
> >
> >> On 15 January 2014 08:50, Gerard Meijssen
gerard.meijssen@gmail.com
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hoi,
> >> One obvious point to start is the functionality of the ULS. It already
> >> serves one function for people who have a handicap with their
> perception.
> >> It has the OpenDyslexic font for people with dyslexia. There are
> multiple
> >> ways functionality can be provided who have a visual handicap. The size
> of
> >> the characters can be increased, the colour scheme can be changed (some
> >> people only see yellow on white..)
> >>
> >> If there is one thing wrong with the ULS, it is not in the functionality
> >> but by the utter lack of visibility. ULS is a major component of
> MediaWiki
> >> and it is not given prominence, Truly how are people going to find
> >> OpenDyslexic... (we are talking about 7 to 10% of a population)...
> >>
> >> Work is done to get more support for webfonts on mobile phones.. It is
> >> being developed.
> >> Thanks,
> >> GerardM
> >>
> >>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia UK mailing list
> wikimediauk-l@wikimedia.org
>
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
> WMUK:
http://uk.wikimedia.org
>