On 17 May 2016 at 00:15, geni geniice@gmail.com wrote:
Problem is that the document suffers from being to broad and too safe of most people to form much of an opinion about. Indeed its hard to have an opinion on "We promote the values inherent in the concept of open knowledge" beyond that statement being largely meaningless.
To be clear I'm not saying that the document in general is meaningless just that it covers the kind of broad stuff that people tend not to be too interested in. My actual feedback can be found on the talk page.