Brian McNeil:
And this is an argument for what, exactly?
No argument; I'm merely pointing out that a direct comparison between WM-UK and the NT might be misleading, since their fundraising methods and goals are quite different.
You trimmed all the positive points I made to denigrate the proposal by insinuating I'm advocating sky-high membership fees.
I've read my post again, and I really can't see how you came to this conclusion. I trimmed the rest of your post because it wasn't relevant to the point I was making. I insinuated nothing. I have expressed no opinion on either side of the discussion, so I have no reason to do so.
In fact, in the very text I quoted, you indicated that you found the NT membership fee to be "a little steep". I find it unlikely that someone would read this text and come to the conclusion that you believe WM-UK should charge as much for membership.
- river.
PS: "Assume good faith" might be a little trite, but it's not a bad idea.