Not from me, if that is what you are implying. I have not been in touch with either publication. As for the Signpost piece, it is a fair summary of what they wrote, which is the Signpost's job to deliver.
Andreas
On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 9:01 PM, David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
On 9 February 2013 20:56, Andy Mabbett andy@pigsonthewing.org.uk wrote:
On 9 February 2013 13:08, Thehelpfulone thehelpfulonewiki@gmail.com
wrote:
http://www.civilsociety.co.uk/governance/news/content/14428/wikimedia_uk_tru...
This also refers to an "an intellectual property dispute over QRPedia", which is, of course, bunkum.
Oh, look who else quotes this claim:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2013-02-11/In_the...
I wonder where they got it from.
- d.
Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediauk-l@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org