On Feb 11, 2013 5:07 PM, "Charles Matthews" charles.r.matthews@ntlworld.com wrote:
On 11 February 2013 17:02, Andy Mabbett andy@pigsonthewing.org.uk wrote:
I'm not sure why you've attached your top-posted comment to my post; but to be clear; my purpose is not to apportion blame, nor to make criticisms I'm interested in correcting a false impression that has been given in the media of a dispute which did not occur. I'm delighted - and relieved - that agreement to transfer ownership of QRpedia has been reached, and have been calling for that for sometime. However, I don't wish to "move on" until reasonable efforts have been made to correct the aforesaid false impression.Your support in this endeavour would be welcome.
I think we've established that your view that a false impression has been given is that of someone with a partial view of the proceedings, and that the WMUK Secretary, who has a fuller view to go on, doesn't see things the same way.
Move next business.
You're free to think that, of course, regardless of the facts of the matter.
-- Andy Mabbett