With my comms head on (and as an individual, not an employee of WMUK) I would say this is very difficult. The exception in my view would be neutral factual data, such as addresses, date of formation and so on. Even things such as financial information could be seen as a COI, especially if they show their client in a favourable light.
Stevie (as an individual, not as a WMUK employee)
On 28 June 2012 17:14, Richard Symonds richard.symonds@wikimedia.org.ukwrote:
Are there PRs who edit for their clients without a COI? Serious question!
Richard Symonds Wikimedia UK 0207 065 0992 Disclaimer viewable at http://uk.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia:Email_disclaimer Visit http://www.wikimedia.org.uk/ and @wikimediauk
On 28 June 2012 17:05, David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
On 28 June 2012 17:00, Richard Symonds richard.symonds@wikimedia.org.uk wrote:
On 28 June 2012 16:55, Charles Matthews <
charles.r.matthews@ntlworld.com>
wrote:
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/pr-firms-urged-not-to-edit-w...
Ah yes, spotted this on my way in this morning. At least it's accurate!
Coupla PRs on CREWE are *deeply* upset it says that PR people shouldn't edit, rather than that PRs *with a COI* shouldn't edit. Apparently this is "amoral".
- d.
Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediauk-l@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediauk-l@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org