Tom, there is a copy on the office wiki, and a copy was sent to each panel member (Jon,Martin, and myself). It's not my place to share the contents with you, but you can ask Jon or Martin if you feel strongly.
Having refreshed my memory, Midas' bid stated that the handouts they used during the training sessions would be CC-By-SA. It will come as no surprise to those who know me well that I can't lay my hands on the handouts at this particular moment, but if anybody would like to see them, I have them somewhere.
The questionnaire I referred to in my previous email is the Honey and Mumford Learning Styles questionnaire, which is copyrighted by a third party. ---- Harry Mitchell http://enwp.org/User:HJ
Phone: 024 7698 0977 Skype: harry_j_mitchell
________________________________ From: HJ Mitchell hjmitchell@ymail.com To: UK Wikimedia mailing list wikimediauk-l@lists.wikimedia.org Sent: Sunday, 1 July 2012, 22:56 Subject: Re: [Wikimediauk-l] "open access ethos of Wikimedia UK"
My understanding (the people to ask would be Martin and Jon, but this is my understanding in the interim), is that there was one document - designed to evaluate learning styles and divide participants into four categories - which they used, but for which the copyright belonged to a third party.
I was under the impression that all the training materials themselves were to be released under the CC-By-SA license. ---- Harry Mitchell http://enwp.org/User:HJ
Phone: 024 7698 0977 Skype: harry_j_mitchell
________________________________ From: "fabian@unpopular.org.uk" fabian@unpopular.org.uk To: wikimediauk-l@lists.wikimedia.org Sent: Sunday, 1 July 2012, 22:47 Subject: [Wikimediauk-l] "open access ethos of Wikimedia UK"
Hi all,
I would like to know what other people understand as the "open access ethos of Wikimedia UK". The reason I ask is that I have been informed that Midas - who are delivering the Training for Trainers programme - have been arguing that as they chose to use a process which was not written for WMUK, some of their material is not available under a CC license. They have suggested that WMUK pay an additional fee which they are happy to quote for.
As the initial tender specified "An agreement that the training materials produced will be open access under a CC-BY-SA licence" I do not really understand how Midas chose to use non CC material in the process for delivering their course. At first glance it would seem that this is not in compliance with the temrs of the tender.
I must admit that I find Open access and open content as being quite fundamental to Wikipedia, the sister projects and WMUK. This is whaqt I understand by "Supporting Free and Open Knowledge". I personally have a strong commitment to developing "Open Educational Resources" and was particularly looking forward to the Eduwiki conference which has this as one of its themes.
In this context, I don't really understand why WMUK is having difficulty in making sure that its own training programme sits comfortably into the CC framework. I would welcome any comments which would help explain this?
all the best
Fabian (User:Leutha)
_______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediauk-l@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
_______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediauk-l@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org