I think the journalist was more interested in trying to paint a picture of conflict by asking that question, which makes for a more interesting story for some people. I was really keen for that not to happen. I was more interested in getting across the points about how Wikipedia works and how it can be engaged with, rather than stirring up trouble!
Thanks,
Stevie
On 14 November 2012 11:42, Charles Matthews <charles.r.matthews@ntlworld.com
wrote:
On 14 November 2012 11:25, Stevie Benton stevie.benton@wikimedia.org.uk wrote:
I was asked if I had any specific response to the PRCA comments, but
really
there's nothing helpful to add there, except that talk pages and emails needn't be cumbersome.
Stating the obvious isn't always unhelpful: making the system work properly is win-win for Wikipedia's readers and those with legitimate corrections/updates.
Charles
Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediauk-l@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org