Not bring the industry standard probably makes them not fit for purpose, to be honest. On Apr 17, 2012 1:18 PM, "Thomas Dalton" thomas.dalton@gmail.com wrote:
On 17 April 2012 13:13, Fae faenwp@gmail.com wrote:
On 17 April 2012 13:05, Thomas Dalton thomas.dalton@gmail.com wrote:
Is there not a free/open source alternative for creative publishing?
Stevie needs standard tools to do his job and if someone has a spare license they might donate in-kind, all the better.
The output would be available in various open formats in line with our existing policies.
Open source tools exist, but let's be pragmatic about the inherent cost of attempting to use them if they are not widely accepted in the sector.
I believe our existing policy is to use open source tools whenever they exist and are fit-for-purpose. Just because they aren't the industry standard shouldn't be a reason not to use them.
Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediauk-l@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org