Gordon Joly wrote:
I feel the programme was {{unref}}'ed....
For example, it seemed to suggest that Jimbo was responsible as Editor in Chief.
Dah, considering the number of obvious mistakes even in good coverage of WP, that is more of a misinterpretation. [[Editor in chief]] seems to believe there is a definition, but I had the impression it was a title that could mean anything or nothing (quite apt for Jimbo, therefore). More to the point really was that this was a classic Middle England presentation taking for granted that WP issues weren't just a reason for people to turn off the radio, then ring up and complain. We've come a long way ...
Charles