I was merely stating that your logic is flawed. We aren't claiming any ownership of posts to this list, or content ownership. It's just being reposted as a convienience.
2009/8/26 Brian McNeil brian.mcneil@wikinewsie.org
Uh, what?
I snipped half a dozen paragraphs that had been copied word-for-word from the Daily Mail’s website. That’s a copyright violation. The link isn’t.
Brian.
-----Original Message----- *From:* wikimediauk-l-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org [mailto: wikimediauk-l-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org] *On Behalf Of *Paul Williams *Sent:* 26 August 2009 13:48 *To:* wikimediauk-l@lists.wikimedia.org *Subject:* Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Daily Mail on Flagged Revisions
Under that logic, posting the link is a copyright violation as it does not belong to us.
2009/8/26 Brian McNeil brian.mcneil@wikinewsie.org
Both this list and wikien-l are public. To repost a substantial portion of a news website’s article on either of these mailing lists is a copyright violation.
Brian.
----- Forwarded Message ----- From: "Andrew Turvey" andrewrturvey@googlemail.com To: "English Wikipedia" wikien-l@lists.wikimedia.org Sent: Wednesday, 26 August, 2009 13:20:00 GMT +00:00 GMT Britain, Ireland, Portugal Subject: Daily Mail (England) on Flagged Revisions
Local english tabloid puts it's slant on the news. Unfortunately we didn't get any quote in there.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1208941/Free-edit-Wikipedia-appoints...
Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediauk-l@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediauk-l@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org