On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 23:12 +0100, geni wrote:
I tend towards initial inclusivety then dropping people latter. But if people feel that names should be a requirement for running that is not a problem.
Current skeleton for the voting system can be found at:
As Alison stated, the election is for (what will be) a position on the board of a legally registered company. If this were an election held after the forming of the company, then a candidate legal name would be required information before the election, so it's good practice to do that now as well.
However, since I've already stated my personal position on this particular candidate, I'll shut up now.
KTC