On 10 Aug 2012, at 12:10, David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
On 10 August 2012 12:06, Thomas Dalton thomas.dalton@gmail.com wrote:
The problem, then, is Richard's wording in his email. Recalling them because of a mistake that was pointed out by a board member is different from recalling them because a board member objected. Given the way it was described, I think our reaction was entirely understandable.
Still blatant bikeshedding, nevertheless.
Since we're on the topic, I regret to inform everyone that our nuclear reactor project is significantly delayed due to disagreement about the design and deployment strategy of the cooling rods, and there's a growing consensus to change direction completely and go with wind turbines instead. In good news, though, I understand that lots of progress is being made with the bike shed, although it's beyond my ken to understand all of the details there...
Thanks, Mike
(Sorry, I couldn't resist.)