Of course the consultation should be done privately. Imagine finding out that you've lost your job through a post on a public mailing list. As a mater of basic human decency, the staff should be informed of the decision and supported through what will be a turbulent time for them. That their jobs are now surplus to requirements because of bad management and the board's negligence is no fault of their own. The issue, though, is that it sounds like the consultation is over and the result has been decided and now the staff who have been made redundant are in the awkward position of having to explain that they've left/are leaving before any announcement has been made. Harry Mitchellhttp://enwp.org/User:HJ Phone: +44 (0) 7507 536971 Skype: harry_j_mitchell From: Richard Farmbrough richard@farmbrough.co.uk To: UK Wikimedia mailing list wikimediauk-l@lists.wikimedia.org Sent: Thursday, 7 May 2015, 17:26 Subject: Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Redundancies at WMUK
Fae: I am aware that the legal requirement for a consultation period is limited in scope, however that does not mean that good organisations do not conduct them where they are not legally required.
On 7 May 2015 at 16:35, Andy Mabbett andy@pigsonthewing.org.uk wrote:
On 7 May 2015 at 16:22, Richard Farmbrough richard@farmbrough.co.uk wrote:
The need for a consultation period (with staff) mean that nothing can be pre-announced. If it were, then the consultation would be meaningless, on its face.
Indeed; but it would seem that the announcement would be post-, not pre-.
-- Andy Mabbett @pigsonthewing http://pigsonthewing.org.uk
_______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediauk-l@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk