On 16 Nov 2012, at 15:30, Charles Matthews charles.r.matthews@ntlworld.com wrote:
On 16 November 2012 15:26, Stevie Benton stevie.benton@wikimedia.org.uk wrote:
It doesn't seem to be working!
We do ask that if you've taken part in any WMUK activity that you add it to the report if you're able. I'm not sure why that seems to have dropped off, but there have been plenty of reminders and calls for content.
Perhaps because the "report" is a really dull surrogate for a proper newsletter, allowing the community an editorial voice? And contributing to our public life. Such as the Signpost. And instead looks like the fulfilment of a reporting requirement of a box-ticking kind.
But it seems to work for the GLAM newsletter, where e.g. there is a 'UK report' with pretty much the same intent as the 'Wikimedia UK report'? http://outreach.wikimedia.org/wiki/GLAM/Newsletter/October_2012/Contents/UK_...
Would a simple rename make people feel more able to contribute, or does there need to be more change than that?
Thanks, Mike