Hi all,
After a bit of prodding from various wikipedians I think I've got the licence right on this set of pics taken at the the AGM 26 April: http://www.flickr.com/photos/bowbrick/sets/72157617359600152/
Unrelated question: on Twitter, Chris Vallance, a producer on iPM, wonders:
"Wikipedia received most UK traffic from searches for "Swine Flu" - Should Directgov, NHS, collaborate with the site?"
And links to these numbers from traffic stats house Hitwise: http://weblogs.hitwise.com/robin-goad/2009/05/swine_flu_searches_increas e_58.html
Should we encourage UK public health agencies to expand the Swine Flu article? To treat Wikipedia as part of the public health communications effort? If such a large number of UK searches are hitting the Swine Flu entry, is there a public health argument for branching the entry to provide nationally-specific material?
Is there a Wikipedia response to crises of this kind?
s
-- Editor, BBC Radio 4 Blog http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/radio4 07768 257 570
http://www.bbc.co.uk/ This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system. Do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender immediately. Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received. Further communication will signify your consent to this.