On 1 July 2014 18:45, HJ Mitchell hjmitchell@ymail.com wrote:
I agree that other projects should be considered, as useful background if nothing else
Quite.
but quibbling over details of the past isn't going to help the discussion move forward for the benefit of the *future* of these projects.
I do not believe that reiterating my objection to past good work, by me and others, being written out of the chapter's history is "quibbling", much less "over details".