On 11 Feb 2013, at 20:02, Thomas Dalton thomas.dalton@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 11, 2013 7:59 PM, "geni" geniice@gmail.com wrote:
For example the next issue is how WMUK plans to pay for the upkeep of QRpedia given that it wasn't in the budget.
There shouldn't be an issue there. The costs are minimal. Renewal costs for two domain names and maybe a few hours work by the existing IT contractors to transition things and sort out the security concerns that have been raised. The budget can absorb that.
The need to have developer resources available to set up QRpedia on WMUK servers, and to maintain and improve it, has been thought about for a while now and was incorporated into this year's developer budget (although the activity plan doesn't explicitly state this).
Thanks, Mike