2008/10/17 geni geniice@gmail.com:
2008/10/17 Thomas Dalton thomas.dalton@gmail.com:
Agree about child checked but we hesitated on child-friendly because the reading age of a lot of it is too high (16+).
"child-suitable"?
Child-safe? is shorter
There are two sides to something being good for children, though. It needs to be "safe" (personally, I have more faith in children's abilities to deal with the fact that Mr X had an affair with his pool-boy, but I understand the creators wanting to avoid controversy and get the content used rather than using it as a means to campaign against censorship) and it also needs to be understandable by children. "Child-safe" only covers the first of those, "child-suitable" covers both. (I understand the reluctance to call it "friendly", but I think "suitable" is ok since it means children should be able to copy with it rather than meaning they will find it easy to work with.)