On 6 February 2013 09:32, Charles Matthews charles.r.matthews@ntlworld.com wrote:
On 6 February 2013 09:30, Thomas Dalton thomas.dalton@gmail.com wrote:
I don't want background. I want you to publish the report now. You don't need any more response than "we're looking at it and are beginning discussions with the community, we'll have a fuller response in a few weeks". You could have written that months ago.
Last time you used the "we need to prepare a response" excuse to delay publishing something you ended up publishing it without any response anyway and nothing bad happened, so your good faith is very much in doubt.
Tom, cut it out. In the bigger picture it is going to be much more important that WMUK members hold the Board to implementation of the report.
It's rather hard to know if it will be important to implement the report without having read it... I have no idea what the recommendations are.
When you are forced to co-commission a report into your own failings, making excuses not to publish it doesn't reflect well on you.