Dear all
I've heard back from Tullie House Museum and they are changing the no photography signs on the exhibition to remove the word copyright. However my understanding is that they do have a restriction on photography for the items loaned by the British Museum. My feeling is that this is the most we can ask Tullie House at this point, but that it highlights the need for continued advocacy about copyright and licensing issues to the cultural sector generally, and to the BM more specifically.
Best Lucy
On 31 August 2017 at 10:28, Lucy Crompton-Reid < lucy.crompton-reid@wikimedia.org.uk> wrote:
Hi Fae
You may not have seen my message to this list a few weeks ago that I had been in touch with the Director at Tullie House Museum, who thinks the copyright notice may be a mistake on their part - however he needed to check with the curator responsible who was on holiday at the time. I suspect the curator will be back now so this is a timely reminder to chase this up, which I will do!
Cheers Lucy
On 30 August 2017 at 19:50, Fæ faewik@gmail.com wrote:
Ping :-)
It's been over a month, does anyone know if the Tullie House Museum has removed the misleading copyright notices?
If there has been no contact yet, I'd be happy to send off a letter as a long term Wikimedia Commons volunteer to the BM and the THM for an official response that I can add to the record on Commons.
Thanks, Fae
On 28 July 2017 at 13:34, Lucy Crompton-Reid lucy.crompton-reid@wikimedia.org.uk wrote:
Hi Fae, Andy, and all
I agree that trying to apply copyright to a 2000 year old item is pretty outrageous, although I'm going to suppose that it stems from ignorance rather than anything else. We have some contacts at the BM although I'm
not
sure about Tullie House Museum, however I'm happy to contact both institutions, in the first instance, to give them the opportunity to
correct
this. I'll let you know how I get on.
Cheers Lucy
On 28 July 2017 at 13:24, Andy Mabbett andy@pigsonthewing.org.uk
wrote:
On 28 July 2017 at 13:11, Richard Nevell richard.nevell@wikimedia.org.uk wrote:
Attempting to embarrass the British Museum is misguided and certainly would not build bridges for future collaboration.
Perhaps, but as Fae indicates, it might also cause some movement.
What's your - WMUK's, I mean - alternative proposed action?
-- Andy Mabbett @pigsonthewing http://pigsonthewing.org.uk
Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediauk-l@wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk
--
Lucy Crompton-Reid
Chief Executive
Wikimedia UK
+44 (0) 207 065 0991
Wikimedia UK is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and Wales, Registered No. 6741827. Registered Charity No.1144513. Registered Office 4th Floor, Development House, 56-64 Leonard Street, London EC2A
4LT.
Wikimedia UK is the UK chapter of a global Wikimedia movement. The
Wikimedia
projects are run by the Wikimedia Foundation (who operate Wikipedia,
amongst
other projects). Wikimedia UK is an independent non-profit charity with
no
legal control over Wikipedia nor responsibility for its contents.
-- faewik@gmail.com https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Fae
Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediauk-l@wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk
--
Lucy Crompton-Reid
Chief Executive
Wikimedia UK
+44 (0) 203 372 0762
Wikimedia UK is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and Wales, Registered No. 6741827. Registered Charity No.1144513. Registered Office Ground Floor, Europoint, 5 - 11 Lavington Street, London SE1 0NZ.
Wikimedia UK is the UK chapter of a global Wikimedia movement. The Wikimedia projects are run by the Wikimedia Foundation (who operate Wikipedia, amongst other projects). *Wikimedia UK is an independent non-profit charity with no legal control over Wikipedia nor responsibility for its contents.*