Employed editing? Clarify. Because a company can employ someone to edit.
Regards, Sandister Tei ----- Cardiff University JOMEC -- International Journalism www.sandistertei.com | +447448223686
On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 5:27 PM, Nkansah Rexford nkansahrexford@gmail.comwrote:
Interesting read. Your question of who is right? Hmmm, for me, the Wikimedia foundation is right.
The Wikimedia foundation frowns on paid editing, that's it I think. Employed editing is the way forward.
Rexford | Africa Center | wikiafrica.net | sent from Tab On Feb 1, 2014 6:39 PM, "Sandister Tei" sandistertei@gmail.com wrote:
So someone got into trouble for paid editinghttp://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2014/01/wikimedia-foundation-employee-ousted-over-paid-editing/. The Wikipedia article on paid editing doesn't sayhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Paid_editing_(essay)it's always wrong.
Who is right?
Regards, Sandister Tei
Cardiff University JOMEC -- International Journalism www.sandistertei.com | +447448223686
Wikimedia-GH mailing list Wikimedia-GH@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-gh
Wikimedia-GH mailing list Wikimedia-GH@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-gh