Employed editing? Clarify. Because a company can employ someone to edit.

Regards,
Sandister Tei
-----
Cardiff University
JOMEC -- International Journalism
www.sandistertei.com | +447448223686


On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 5:27 PM, Nkansah Rexford <nkansahrexford@gmail.com> wrote:

Interesting read. Your question of who is right? Hmmm, for me, the Wikimedia foundation is right.

The Wikimedia foundation frowns on paid editing, that's it I think. Employed editing is the way forward.

Rexford | Africa Center | wikiafrica.net | sent from Tab

On Feb 1, 2014 6:39 PM, "Sandister Tei" <sandistertei@gmail.com> wrote:
So someone got into trouble for paid editing. The Wikipedia article on paid editing doesn't say it's always wrong. 

Who is right?


Regards,
Sandister Tei
-----
Cardiff University
JOMEC -- International Journalism
www.sandistertei.com | +447448223686

_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-GH mailing list
Wikimedia-GH@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-gh


_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-GH mailing list
Wikimedia-GH@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-gh