It's not about our opinions within the m.list.
The discussion on the page I shared will be likely imposed.
Our say and contribution will be more powerful when sent to that discussion. On Feb 21, 2014 2:12 PM, "Oral Ofori" oralofori@gmail.com wrote:
My stance remains unchanged, time is money first of all.
Provided paid editing is devoid of advertisement and PR undertones, some see it as a motivation to get work done in a quick way so long as the editor sticks to quality and uses verifiable facts devoid of bias and shoddy work...
We can not run away from this issue until it's permanently resolved, see below for a case related to it:
http://www.itbusiness.ca/blog/wikipedia-is-too-late-to-stop-paid-editing/467...
http://www.about.me/oralofori On Feb 21, 2014 6:58 AM, "Sandister Tei" sandistertei@gmail.com wrote:
Paid editing and disclosure policy http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Terms_of_use/Paid_contributions_amendmentin discussion at WMF.
Join the discussion.
Regards, Sandister Tei
Cardiff University JOMEC -- International Journalism www.sandistertei.com | +447448223686
Wikimedia-GH mailing list Wikimedia-GH@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-gh
Wikimedia-GH mailing list Wikimedia-GH@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-gh