It's not about our opinions within the m.list.
The discussion on the page I shared will be likely imposed.
Our say and contribution will be more powerful when sent to that discussion.
My stance remains unchanged, time is money first of all.
Provided paid editing is devoid of advertisement and PR undertones, some see it as a motivation to get work done in a quick way so long as the editor sticks to quality and uses verifiable facts devoid of bias and shoddy work...
We can not run away from this issue until it's permanently resolved, see below for a case related to it:
http://www.itbusiness.ca/blog/wikipedia-is-too-late-to-stop-paid-editing/46793
On Feb 21, 2014 6:58 AM, "Sandister Tei" <sandistertei@gmail.com> wrote:Paid editing and disclosure policy in discussion at WMF.
Join the discussion.Regards,Sandister Tei-----
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-GH mailing list
Wikimedia-GH@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-gh
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-GH mailing list
Wikimedia-GH@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-gh