Good questions, Raphael
- Will this new Twi Wikipedia be specific in terms of being Asante,
Akuapim or Fante?
Yes, it’ll be specific to one, namely, Asante Twi. However, that raises the
question, ‘How about Akuapim or Fante?’, which is legit to ask.
Encompassing all would have been ideal, but that will give in to chaos.
But, here’s a probable solution.
Will it thus make sense to mix them, but not in-articles, in separate
articles? What I mean is, Person/Place A’s article could be labeled as
Akuapim, yet another article of Person/Place B labeled as Asante.
So an article labeled as Akuapim will mean, whoever edits it, **must**
stick to Akuapim for that article. By default, every article will be in
Asante unless otherwise indicated
That way, it doesn’t appear that the other dialects are sidelined. Just a
probable solution though there, **but**, the Twi will be Asante by default.
- Are we going to have one Wikipedia for all? Or we will be looking at
developing these individual Akan languages subsequently?
So yeah, one for Asante, with room for article-specific dialect options.
*From: *Raphael Berchie <rberchie(a)gmail.com>
*Sent: *Friday, November 8, 2019 1:54 PM
*To: *Wikimedia Ghana User Group <wikimedia-gh(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
*Subject: *Re: [Wikimedia-GH] Akan vs Twi Wikipedia - Next Steps?
Hello Rex,
I think this is a great initiative as a contributor to the Twi Wikipedia I
get confused a lot of time. I believe if we streamline one it will help us
all.
I however have some concerns. Will this new Twi Wikipedia be specific in
terms of being Asante, Akuapim or Fante? Or it will encompass all? I am
asking this because although all these Akan languages look similar they are
different in many ways. I edit in Asante Twi and find it difficult to write
or even understand certain works in Fante and Akuapem.
Are we going to have one Wikipedia for all? Or we will be looking at
developing these individual Akan languages subsequently?
Regards.
On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 3:27 AM Rexford <nkansahrexford(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hello all,
Currently there are two local Wikipedias related to the Akan language,
namely,
tw.wikipedia.org (Twi) and
ak.wikipedia.org (Akan)
In Telegram (the African Wikimedia group), we’ve been having discussions on
going forward with both wikipedias. It is clear one of them needs to be
dropped. Which to drop, we to an extent agree it should be the
ak.wikipedia.org, and the
tw.wikipedia.org maintained.
First of all, is that a good step? Any objection(s) to that?
The goal, if I understand clearly, of going forward with only one means
having a streamlined effort in editing. Managing a Wikipedia language space
is not easy, let alone two, and with the limited number of hands on deck
for the local language, a single point of contribution appears much more
worthwhile.
There are articles on both wikipedias at the moment, when the
tw.wikipedia.org is the choice going forward (assuming there’s no
objection), the next step would be to merge the few articles on
ak.wikipedia.org into the
tw.wikipedia.org
When all of that is copied over and merged, we can put in a word to ask for
the
ak.wikipedia.org can be shutdown (If that’s possible. I guess it is)
The above sounds like the way forward? Any thoughts?
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-GH mailing list
Wikimedia-GH(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-gh
--
R