Hi, all!
I am the president of Wikimedia Norge now, and we have a project idea to create Wikipedias in Kven [fkv] (5000 speakers in Norway), Southern Sami [sma] (600 speakers in Norway and Sweden) and Lule Sami [smj] (2000 speakers in Norway and Sweden). I am not suggesting to bypass the Incubator or translation requirements or anything, but I need your input before we start: Do you think these languages are viable/"big" enough to warrant their own Wikipedias?
Hoi, I would be really pleased when you "prove" that the requirements for languages like these can be met. I would be positively happy.
My advise make it a project with clearly timed goals. As to localisation the first objective is 50% of the most used messages. This is where the localisation update may kick in and where you get the messages in the incubator. Do not forget to localise the Babel extension. It makes a big difference in the use of Wikidata.
When you start writing articles, Do whatever you like but from a demonstration pov do include a set of connected articles. Particularly about the own language and culture. Do reach out and do ask people to write about the subject they care about.
I wish these projects well :) Thanks, Gerard
On 11 July 2013 19:12, Jon Harald Søby jhsoby@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, all!
I am the president of Wikimedia Norge now, and we have a project idea to create Wikipedias in Kven [fkv] (5000 speakers in Norway), Southern Sami [sma] (600 speakers in Norway and Sweden) and Lule Sami [smj] (2000 speakers in Norway and Sweden). I am not suggesting to bypass the Incubator or translation requirements or anything, but I need your input before we start: Do you think these languages are viable/"big" enough to warrant their own Wikipedias?
-- mvh Jon Harald Søby http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Jon_Harald_S%C3%B8by
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
I agree with Gerard.
I wish you success on the new position [it will be hard ;) ], and success to the projects.
-- Amir Elisha Aharoni · אָמִיר אֱלִישָׁע אַהֲרוֹנִי http://aharoni.wordpress.com “We're living in pieces, I want to live in peace.” – T. Moore
2013/7/11 Jon Harald Søby jhsoby@gmail.com:
Hi, all!
I am the president of Wikimedia Norge now, and we have a project idea to create Wikipedias in Kven [fkv] (5000 speakers in Norway), Southern Sami [sma] (600 speakers in Norway and Sweden) and Lule Sami [smj] (2000 speakers in Norway and Sweden). I am not suggesting to bypass the Incubator or translation requirements or anything, but I need your input before we start: Do you think these languages are viable/"big" enough to warrant their own Wikipedias?
-- mvh Jon Harald Søby
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Thanks for the input!
This is purely hypothetical at this point, but what would you think if we were to hire someone (on a short-term basis, of course) to do the translations of core messages? Would that diminish a request in any way?
2013/7/11 Amir E. Aharoni amir.aharoni@mail.huji.ac.il
I agree with Gerard.
I wish you success on the new position [it will be hard ;) ], and success to the projects.
-- Amir Elisha Aharoni · אָמִיר אֱלִישָׁע אַהֲרוֹנִי http://aharoni.wordpress.com “We're living in pieces, I want to live in peace.” – T. Moore
2013/7/11 Jon Harald Søby jhsoby@gmail.com:
Hi, all!
I am the president of Wikimedia Norge now, and we have a project idea to create Wikipedias in Kven [fkv] (5000 speakers in Norway), Southern Sami [sma] (600 speakers in Norway and Sweden) and Lule Sami [smj] (2000
speakers
in Norway and Sweden). I am not suggesting to bypass the Incubator or translation requirements or anything, but I need your input before we
start:
Do you think these languages are viable/"big" enough to warrant their own Wikipedias?
-- mvh Jon Harald Søby
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Hoi, We have NEVER stated anything about the way localisations are done.. We just need them done.
If you pay someone to localise the messages, consider what functionality is important to your editors... You may want to edit things outside of the magical 500.. It would make sense when a new list of messages is compiled anyway.,. Thanks, Gerard
On 12 July 2013 16:38, Jon Harald Søby jhsoby@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the input!
This is purely hypothetical at this point, but what would you think if we were to hire someone (on a short-term basis, of course) to do the translations of core messages? Would that diminish a request in any way?
2013/7/11 Amir E. Aharoni amir.aharoni@mail.huji.ac.il
I agree with Gerard.
I wish you success on the new position [it will be hard ;) ], and success to the projects.
-- Amir Elisha Aharoni · אָמִיר אֱלִישָׁע אַהֲרוֹנִי http://aharoni.wordpress.com “We're living in pieces, I want to live in peace.” – T. Moore
2013/7/11 Jon Harald Søby jhsoby@gmail.com:
Hi, all!
I am the president of Wikimedia Norge now, and we have a project idea to create Wikipedias in Kven [fkv] (5000 speakers in Norway), Southern Sami [sma] (600 speakers in Norway and Sweden) and Lule Sami [smj] (2000
speakers
in Norway and Sweden). I am not suggesting to bypass the Incubator or translation requirements or anything, but I need your input before we
start:
Do you think these languages are viable/"big" enough to warrant their
own
Wikipedias?
-- mvh Jon Harald Søby
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
-- mvh Jon Harald Søby http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Jon_Harald_S%C3%B8by
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Agreed with everything Gerard says. Just one note re
As to localisation the first objective is 50% of the most used messages.
This is where the localisation update may kick in and where you get the messages in the incubator. In fact currently policy of translatewiki.net is to require "18% of the core MediaWiki messages" (it results to ~500 messages, ie. the number of the most-used messages) [1] before they export anything for a newly localised language. I would love if we could convince them to lower that requirement, maybe at the same time an update of the list of most-used messages. I recently had a user on Incubator who made 400 translations and was rather frustrated that that was not enough to show up on Incubator.
[1] http://translatewiki.net/wiki/MediaWiki#Translation_flow
2013/7/12 Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijssen@gmail.com
Hoi, We have NEVER stated anything about the way localisations are done.. We just need them done.
If you pay someone to localise the messages, consider what functionality is important to your editors... You may want to edit things outside of the magical 500.. It would make sense when a new list of messages is compiled anyway.,. Thanks, Gerard
On 12 July 2013 16:38, Jon Harald Søby jhsoby@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the input!
This is purely hypothetical at this point, but what would you think if we were to hire someone (on a short-term basis, of course) to do the translations of core messages? Would that diminish a request in any way?
2013/7/11 Amir E. Aharoni amir.aharoni@mail.huji.ac.il
I agree with Gerard.
I wish you success on the new position [it will be hard ;) ], and success to the projects.
-- Amir Elisha Aharoni · אָמִיר אֱלִישָׁע אַהֲרוֹנִי http://aharoni.wordpress.com “We're living in pieces, I want to live in peace.” – T. Moore
2013/7/11 Jon Harald Søby jhsoby@gmail.com:
Hi, all!
I am the president of Wikimedia Norge now, and we have a project idea
to
create Wikipedias in Kven [fkv] (5000 speakers in Norway), Southern
Sami
[sma] (600 speakers in Norway and Sweden) and Lule Sami [smj] (2000
speakers
in Norway and Sweden). I am not suggesting to bypass the Incubator or translation requirements or anything, but I need your input before we
start:
Do you think these languages are viable/"big" enough to warrant their
own
Wikipedias?
-- mvh Jon Harald Søby
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
-- mvh Jon Harald Søbyhttp://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Jon_Harald_S%C3%B8by
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Har du talt allerede med Trond Trosterud om dette, Jon Harald?
Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/
Vi skal tale mer om det – han er også med i Wikimedia Norges styrelse. :-)
2013/7/14 Michael Everson everson@evertype.com
Har du talt allerede med Trond Trosterud om dette, Jon Harald?
Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom