Hallo,

I marked a few Wiktionary requests as eligible. All of them are in languages in which there already is at least a Wikipedia, so it shouldn't be controversial:

1. https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikisource_Bhojpu... 2. https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikisource_Canton... 3. https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikisource_Cebuan... 4. https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikisource_Ilokan... 5. https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikisource_Kazakh 6. https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikisource_Kapamp... 7. https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikisource_Tulu 8. https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikisource_Waray

If anyone disagrees, please revert me :)

A mostly-technical comment about Bhojpuri: To the best of my understanding, the Bhojpuri *Wikipedia* is at https://bh.wikipedia.org . The code bh is deprecated and when it was in the standard, it referred to "Bihari languages", so the Wikipedia's URL is a historical, technical mistake, that will hopefully be fixed Some Day. The Wikisource request is for code "bho", which is valid.

-- Amir Elisha Aharoni · אָמִיר אֱלִישָׁע אַהֲרוֹנִי http://aharoni.wordpress.com ‪“We're living in pieces, I want to live in peace.” – T. Moore‬