Hallo,

I marked a few Wiktionary requests as eligible. All of them are in languages in which there already is at least a Wikipedia, so it shouldn't be controversial:

1. https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikisource_Bhojpuri
2. https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikisource_Cantonese
3. https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikisource_Cebuano
4. https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikisource_Ilokano
5. https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikisource_Kazakh
6. https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikisource_Kapampangan
7. https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikisource_Tulu
8. https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikisource_Waray

If anyone disagrees, please revert me :)

A mostly-technical comment about Bhojpuri: To the best of my understanding, the Bhojpuri *Wikipedia* is at https://bh.wikipedia.org . The code bh is deprecated and when it was in the standard, it referred to "Bihari languages", so the Wikipedia's URL is a historical, technical mistake, that will hopefully be fixed Some Day. The Wikisource request is for code "bho", which is valid.

--
Amir Elisha Aharoni · אָמִיר אֱלִישָׁע אַהֲרוֹנִי
http://aharoni.wordpress.com
‪“We're living in pieces,
I want to live in peace.” – T. Moore‬