Hoi, Happy as well with the progress. Thanks, GerardM
On 4 December 2016 at 19:42, Milos Rancic millosh@gmail.com wrote:
Agreed, counting that the content is indeed written in proper Ingush.
On Sun, Dec 4, 2016 at 12:39 AM, MF-Warburg mfwarburg@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I think Ingush Wikipedia can be approved, from the activity viewpoint.
The
translation of the most-used messages is complete (http://tools.wmflabs.org/robin/?tool=codelookup&code=inh) and there
has
been a quite high activity since almost ten months now <https://tools.wmflabs.org/meta/catanalysis/index.php?
cat=0&title=Wp/inh&wiki=incubatorwiki>.
Now we would of course need verificiation of the content. Searching the archives, I found a mail from Amir from 10 November 2011. Back then, a linguist had said the language in the test-wiki was not quite what would
be
expected from literary Ingush. However, the current editors are all different from the ones that were active five years ago. Amir, could you check with that linguist or someone else from the Ingush State University again about the quality of the content?
Best regards, MF-W
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom