Agreed, counting that the content is indeed written in proper Ingush.

On Sun, Dec 4, 2016 at 12:39 AM, MF-Warburg <mfwarburg@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I think Ingush Wikipedia can be approved, from the activity viewpoint. The
> translation of the most-used messages is complete
> (<http://tools.wmflabs.org/robin/?tool=codelookup&code=inh>) and there has
> been a quite high activity since almost ten months now
> <https://tools.wmflabs.org/meta/catanalysis/index.php?cat=0&title=Wp/inh&wiki=incubatorwiki>.
>
> Now we would of course need verificiation of the content. Searching the
> archives, I found a mail from Amir from 10 November 2011. Back then, a
> linguist had said the language in the test-wiki was not quite what would be
> expected from literary Ingush. However, the current editors are all
> different from the ones that were active five years ago.
> Amir, could you check with that linguist or someone else from the Ingush
> State University again about the quality of the content?
>
> Best regards, MF-W
>

> _______________________________________________
> Langcom mailing list
> Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
>

_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom