Hi all, I think Ingush Wikipedia can be approved, from the activity viewpoint. The translation of the most-used messages is complete (<http://tools.wmflabs.org/robin/?tool=codelookup&code=inh>) and there has been a quite high activity since almost ten months now <https://tools.wmflabs.org/meta/catanalysis/index.php?cat=0&title=Wp/inh&wiki=incubatorwiki>. Now we would of course need verificiation of the content. Searching the archives, I found a mail from Amir from 10 November 2011. Back then, a linguist had said the language in the test-wiki was not quite what would be expected from literary Ingush. However, the current editors are all different from the ones that were active five years ago. Amir, could you check with that linguist or someone else from the Ingush State University again about the quality of the content? Best regards, MF-W _______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list Langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom

Hi all, I think Ingush Wikipedia can be approved, from the activity viewpoint. The translation of the most-used messages is complete (< http://tools.wmflabs.org/robin/?tool=codelookup&code=inh>) and there has been a quite high activity since almost ten months now < https://tools.wmflabs.org/meta/catanalysis/index.php? cat=0&title=Wp/inh&wiki=incubatorwiki>. Now we would of course need verificiation of the content. Searching the archives, I found a mail from Amir from 10 November 2011. Back then, a linguist had said the language in the test-wiki was not quite what would be expected from literary Ingush. However, the current editors are all different from the ones that were active five years ago. Amir, could you check with that linguist or someone else from the Ingush State University again about the quality of the content? Best regards, MF-W _______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list Langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom