Hoi, There is a difference between automatic approval and automatic creation. It does not make sense to create projects because we can. It only makes sense when there are people who make the point by asking, by making an argument. Thanks, GerardM
On 1 December 2015 at 00:06, Leon Liesener leon.liesener@wikipedia.de wrote:
What makes an own Wikisource subdomain that much better than storing the content on OldWS? The disadvantage with an automatic approval of Wikisources I see is that while a community might be big enough to maintain 1 project, it does not automatically mean they will also be able to maintain 2 of them.
Regards, Leon
Op 30 nov. 2015 om 15:53 heeft Milos Rancic millosh@gmail.com het
volgende geschreven:
Yes, from "Wikimedia Foundation Language Committee"... My Gmail has taken this description by default from somebody...
So, first, MF-Warburg says Georgian Wikisource should go regularly.
I suggest Neapolitan Wikisource should go fast forward.
And I suggest we amend the rules which would say something like "After the first project created, community can get Wikisource at any point of time." -- or whatever appropriate.
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 3:31 PM, Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijssen@gmail.com wrote:
Hoi, You are not. My bad, it shows as wikimedia, I thought it was wikimedia-l Thanks, GerardM
On 30 November 2015 at 15:24, Milos Rancic millosh@gmail.com wrote:
Gerard, we are talking here via the list langcom@lists.wikimedia.org.
Am I
missing something?
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 3:21 PM, Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijssen@gmail.com wrote:
Hoi, The right mailing list is the mailing list of the language committee.
All
its members are subscribed to that one. Thanks, GerardM
On 30 November 2015 at 14:14, Milos Rancic millosh@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 1:08 PM, MF-Warburg <
mfwarburg@googlemail.com>
wrote: > > I don't understand. If ka.ws fulfills the activity requirements,
it can
> be approved. Did anyone check it already?
No :) I am a bit out of regular LangCom duties, so I actually asked
that
inside of the first email.
On the other side, I do think we should make WS requests approval
much
quicker, as in the most of the new requests, it will be used for
language
preservation.
Gerard, may you explain what do you think with "It is the wrong mailinglist for that." What's the right method to discuss this in
your
opinion?
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom