May we then change the policy and say that Wikisource could be created after the first project whenever community finds it suitable? On Nov 29, 2015 00:37, "Gerard Meijssen" <gerard.meijssen(a)gmail.com> wrote:

OK. May we solve those two cases on ad hoc basis and start discussion about lowering requirements for Wikisource? On Nov 29, 2015 01:40, "Gerard Meijssen" <gerard.meijssen(a)gmail.com> wrote:

I don't understand. If ka.ws fulfills the activity requirements, it can be approved. Did anyone check it already? Am 30.11.2015 13:02 schrieb "Gerard Meijssen" <gerard.meijssen(a)gmail.com>om>:

Hoi, The right mailing list is the mailing list of the language committee. All its members are subscribed to that one. Thanks, GerardM On 30 November 2015 at 14:14, Milos Rancic <millosh(a)gmail.com> wrote:

Hoi, You are not. My bad, it shows as wikimedia, I thought it was wikimedia-l Thanks, GerardM On 30 November 2015 at 15:24, Milos Rancic <millosh(a)gmail.com> wrote:

Yes, let's approve them. -- Amir Elisha Aharoni · אָמִיר אֱלִישָׁע אַהֲרוֹנִי http://aharoni.wordpress.com ‪“We're living in pieces, I want to live in peace.” – T. Moore‬ 2015-11-30 16:53 GMT+02:00 Milos Rancic <millosh(a)gmail.com>om>:

Unfortunately, there is not very much activity: < https://tools.wmflabs.org/meta/catanalysis/?title=Georgian&cat=1&wi… About interface translations, core and the 2 Wikisource-specific extensions are nearly complete and there is also activity on TWN < https://translatewiki.net/w/i.php?title=Special:TranslationStats&langua…p;graphit=1>; that seems OK to me. 2015-11-30 22:59 GMT+01:00 Antony Green &lt;toniogreen(a)web.de&gt;de>: > I support the approval of Georgian Wikisource. > Am 2015-11-30 um 21:26 schrieb Amir E. Aharoni: > Yes, let's approve them. > -- > Amir Elisha Aharoni · אָמִיר אֱלִישָׁע אַהֲרוֹנִי > http://aharoni.wordpress.com > ‪“We're living in pieces, > I want to live in peace.” – T. Moore‬ > 2015-11-30 16:53 GMT+02:00 Milos Rancic &lt;millosh(a)gmail.com&gt;om>: >> Yes, from "Wikimedia Foundation Language Committee"... My Gmail has >> taken this description by default from somebody... >>> So, first, MF-Warburg says Georgian Wikisource should go regularly. >>> I suggest Neapolitan Wikisource should go fast forward. >>> And I suggest we amend the rules which would say something like "After >> the first project created, community can get Wikisource at any point >> of time." -- or whatever appropriate. >>>> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 3:31 PM, Gerard Meijssen >> &lt;gerard.meijssen(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: >> > Hoi, >> > You are not. My bad, it shows as wikimedia, I thought it was wikimedia-l >> > Thanks, >> > GerardM >> >> > On 30 November 2015 at 15:24, Milos Rancic < &lt;millosh(a)gmail.com>> millosh(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: >> >>> >> Gerard, we are talking here via the list &lt;langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org>> langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org. Am I >> >> missing something? >> >>> >> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 3:21 PM, Gerard Meijssen >> >> &lt;gerard.meijssen(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: >> >>>> >>> Hoi, >> >>> The right mailing list is the mailing list of the language committee. >> All >> >>> its members are subscribed to that one. >> >>> Thanks, >> >>> GerardM >> >>>> >>> On 30 November 2015 at 14:14, Milos Rancic &lt;millosh(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: >> >>>>> >>>> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 1:08 PM, MF-Warburg < >> mfwarburg(a)googlemail.com>> >>>> wrote: >> >>>>>> >>>>> I don't understand. If ka.ws fulfills the activity requirements, >> it can >> >>>>> be approved. Did anyone check it already? >> >>>>> >>>> No :) I am a bit out of regular LangCom duties, so I actually asked >> that >> >>>> inside of the first email. >> >>>>> >>>> On the other side, I do think we should make WS requests approval >> much >> >>>> quicker, as in the most of the new requests, it will be used for >> language >> >>>> preservation. >> >>>>> >>>> Gerard, may you explain what do you think with "It is the wrong >> >>>> mailinglist for that." What's the right method to discuss this in >> your >> >>>> opinion? >> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >> >>>> Langcom mailing list >> >>>> Langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org >> >>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom >> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >> >>> Langcom mailing list >> >>> Langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org >> >>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom >> >>>> >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> Langcom mailing list >> >> Langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org >> >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom >> >>> >> >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Langcom mailing list >> > Langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org >> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom >> >>> _______________________________________________ >> Langcom mailing list >> Langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom >> _______________________________________________ > Langcom mailing listLangcom@lists.wikimedia.orghttps://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom > -- > Dr. Antony Green > WE 1703 > Rudolf-Seiffert-Str. 31 > 10369 Berlin > Germany > E-mail: toniogreen(a)web.de > Phone: +49-30-34 50 98 97 > Mobile: +49-176-82 29 59 20 > _______________________________________________ > Langcom mailing list > Langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom

What makes an own Wikisource subdomain that much better than storing the content on OldWS? The disadvantage with an automatic approval of Wikisources I see is that while a community might be big enough to maintain 1 project, it does not automatically mean they will also be able to maintain 2 of them. Regards, Leon