Hey! Brute from Georgia asked me what's the issue with the request for Georgian Wikisource. I suppose others are better introduced into it.
BTW, I think we should approve Wikisource requests in fast forward manner, as it means we'd get more PD texts sooner.
Something like "you get Wikisource for the "price" of the first project".
On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 9:28 AM, Sandro Gambashidze gambasha777@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Millosh! I'm user BRUTE from Georgia. I'm writing to you regarding the Georgian wikisource. Long time ago it was recognized as an eligible project on meta-wiki but it is still away from running. Can you please tell us what procedures should we make and is it all about translating mediawiki messages again? Thanks...
Hoi, The Neapolitan Wikisource wants this as well.
I am in favour. Thanks, GerardM
On 28 November 2015 at 21:15, Milos Rancic millosh@wikimedia.org wrote:
Hey! Brute from Georgia asked me what's the issue with the request for Georgian Wikisource. I suppose others are better introduced into it.
BTW, I think we should approve Wikisource requests in fast forward manner, as it means we'd get more PD texts sooner.
Something like "you get Wikisource for the "price" of the first project".
On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 9:28 AM, Sandro Gambashidze <gambasha777@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello Millosh! I'm user BRUTE from Georgia. I'm writing to you regarding the Georgian wikisource. Long time ago it was recognized as an eligible project on meta-wiki but it is still away from running. Can you please tell us what procedures should we make and is it all about translating mediawiki messages again? Thanks...
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
May we then change the policy and say that Wikisource could be created after the first project whenever community finds it suitable? On Nov 29, 2015 00:37, "Gerard Meijssen" gerard.meijssen@gmail.com wrote:
Hoi, The Neapolitan Wikisource wants this as well.
I am in favour. Thanks, GerardM
On 28 November 2015 at 21:15, Milos Rancic millosh@wikimedia.org wrote:
Hey! Brute from Georgia asked me what's the issue with the request for Georgian Wikisource. I suppose others are better introduced into it.
BTW, I think we should approve Wikisource requests in fast forward manner, as it means we'd get more PD texts sooner.
Something like "you get Wikisource for the "price" of the first project".
On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 9:28 AM, Sandro Gambashidze < gambasha777@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello Millosh! I'm user BRUTE from Georgia. I'm writing to you regarding the Georgian wikisource. Long time ago it was recognized as an eligible project on meta-wiki but it is still away from running. Can you please tell us what procedures should we make and is it all about translating mediawiki messages again? Thanks...
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Hoi, You know very well how it works. So it is not that easy. Thanks, GerardM
On 29 November 2015 at 00:40, Milos Rancic millosh@gmail.com wrote:
May we then change the policy and say that Wikisource could be created after the first project whenever community finds it suitable? On Nov 29, 2015 00:37, "Gerard Meijssen" gerard.meijssen@gmail.com wrote:
Hoi, The Neapolitan Wikisource wants this as well.
I am in favour. Thanks, GerardM
On 28 November 2015 at 21:15, Milos Rancic millosh@wikimedia.org wrote:
Hey! Brute from Georgia asked me what's the issue with the request for Georgian Wikisource. I suppose others are better introduced into it.
BTW, I think we should approve Wikisource requests in fast forward manner, as it means we'd get more PD texts sooner.
Something like "you get Wikisource for the "price" of the first project".
On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 9:28 AM, Sandro Gambashidze < gambasha777@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello Millosh! I'm user BRUTE from Georgia. I'm writing to you regarding the Georgian wikisource. Long time ago it was recognized as an eligible project on meta-wiki but it is still away from running. Can you please tell us what procedures should we make and is it all about translating mediawiki messages again? Thanks...
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
OK. May we solve those two cases on ad hoc basis and start discussion about lowering requirements for Wikisource? On Nov 29, 2015 01:40, "Gerard Meijssen" gerard.meijssen@gmail.com wrote:
Hoi, You know very well how it works. So it is not that easy. Thanks, GerardM
On 29 November 2015 at 00:40, Milos Rancic millosh@gmail.com wrote:
May we then change the policy and say that Wikisource could be created after the first project whenever community finds it suitable? On Nov 29, 2015 00:37, "Gerard Meijssen" gerard.meijssen@gmail.com wrote:
Hoi, The Neapolitan Wikisource wants this as well.
I am in favour. Thanks, GerardM
On 28 November 2015 at 21:15, Milos Rancic millosh@wikimedia.org wrote:
Hey! Brute from Georgia asked me what's the issue with the request for Georgian Wikisource. I suppose others are better introduced into it.
BTW, I think we should approve Wikisource requests in fast forward manner, as it means we'd get more PD texts sooner.
Something like "you get Wikisource for the "price" of the first project".
On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 9:28 AM, Sandro Gambashidze < gambasha777@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello Millosh! I'm user BRUTE from Georgia. I'm writing to you regarding the Georgian wikisource. Long time ago it was recognized as an eligible project on meta-wiki but it is still away from running. Can you please tell us what procedures should we make and is it all about translating mediawiki messages again? Thanks...
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Hoi, It is the wrong mailinglist for that. Thanks, GerardM
On 30 November 2015 at 11:59, Milos Rancic millosh@gmail.com wrote:
OK. May we solve those two cases on ad hoc basis and start discussion about lowering requirements for Wikisource? On Nov 29, 2015 01:40, "Gerard Meijssen" gerard.meijssen@gmail.com wrote:
Hoi, You know very well how it works. So it is not that easy. Thanks, GerardM
On 29 November 2015 at 00:40, Milos Rancic millosh@gmail.com wrote:
May we then change the policy and say that Wikisource could be created after the first project whenever community finds it suitable? On Nov 29, 2015 00:37, "Gerard Meijssen" gerard.meijssen@gmail.com wrote:
Hoi, The Neapolitan Wikisource wants this as well.
I am in favour. Thanks, GerardM
On 28 November 2015 at 21:15, Milos Rancic millosh@wikimedia.org wrote:
Hey! Brute from Georgia asked me what's the issue with the request for Georgian Wikisource. I suppose others are better introduced into it.
BTW, I think we should approve Wikisource requests in fast forward manner, as it means we'd get more PD texts sooner.
Something like "you get Wikisource for the "price" of the first project".
On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 9:28 AM, Sandro Gambashidze < gambasha777@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello Millosh! I'm user BRUTE from Georgia. I'm writing to you regarding the Georgian wikisource. Long time ago it was recognized as an eligible project on meta-wiki but it is still away from running. Can you please tell us what procedures should we make and is it all about translating mediawiki messages again? Thanks...
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
I don't understand. If ka.ws fulfills the activity requirements, it can be approved. Did anyone check it already? Am 30.11.2015 13:02 schrieb "Gerard Meijssen" gerard.meijssen@gmail.com:
Hoi, It is the wrong mailinglist for that. Thanks, GerardM
On 30 November 2015 at 11:59, Milos Rancic millosh@gmail.com wrote:
OK. May we solve those two cases on ad hoc basis and start discussion about lowering requirements for Wikisource? On Nov 29, 2015 01:40, "Gerard Meijssen" gerard.meijssen@gmail.com wrote:
Hoi, You know very well how it works. So it is not that easy. Thanks, GerardM
On 29 November 2015 at 00:40, Milos Rancic millosh@gmail.com wrote:
May we then change the policy and say that Wikisource could be created after the first project whenever community finds it suitable? On Nov 29, 2015 00:37, "Gerard Meijssen" gerard.meijssen@gmail.com wrote:
Hoi, The Neapolitan Wikisource wants this as well.
I am in favour. Thanks, GerardM
On 28 November 2015 at 21:15, Milos Rancic millosh@wikimedia.org wrote:
Hey! Brute from Georgia asked me what's the issue with the request for Georgian Wikisource. I suppose others are better introduced into it.
BTW, I think we should approve Wikisource requests in fast forward manner, as it means we'd get more PD texts sooner.
Something like "you get Wikisource for the "price" of the first project".
On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 9:28 AM, Sandro Gambashidze < gambasha777@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello Millosh! I'm user BRUTE from Georgia. I'm writing to you > regarding the Georgian wikisource. Long time ago it was recognized as an > eligible project on meta-wiki but it is still away from running. Can you > please tell us what procedures should we make and is it all about > translating mediawiki messages again? Thanks... >
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 1:08 PM, MF-Warburg mfwarburg@googlemail.com wrote:
I don't understand. If ka.ws fulfills the activity requirements, it can be approved. Did anyone check it already?
No :) I am a bit out of regular LangCom duties, so I actually asked that inside of the first email.
On the other side, I do think we should make WS requests approval much quicker, as in the most of the new requests, it will be used for language preservation.
Gerard, may you explain what do you think with "It is the wrong mailinglist for that." What's the right method to discuss this in your opinion?
Hoi, The right mailing list is the mailing list of the language committee. All its members are subscribed to that one. Thanks, GerardM
On 30 November 2015 at 14:14, Milos Rancic millosh@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 1:08 PM, MF-Warburg mfwarburg@googlemail.com wrote:
I don't understand. If ka.ws fulfills the activity requirements, it can be approved. Did anyone check it already?
No :) I am a bit out of regular LangCom duties, so I actually asked that inside of the first email.
On the other side, I do think we should make WS requests approval much quicker, as in the most of the new requests, it will be used for language preservation.
Gerard, may you explain what do you think with "It is the wrong mailinglist for that." What's the right method to discuss this in your opinion?
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Gerard, we are talking here via the list langcom@lists.wikimedia.org. Am I missing something?
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 3:21 PM, Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijssen@gmail.com wrote:
Hoi, The right mailing list is the mailing list of the language committee. All its members are subscribed to that one. Thanks, GerardM
On 30 November 2015 at 14:14, Milos Rancic millosh@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 1:08 PM, MF-Warburg mfwarburg@googlemail.com wrote:
I don't understand. If ka.ws fulfills the activity requirements, it can be approved. Did anyone check it already?
No :) I am a bit out of regular LangCom duties, so I actually asked that inside of the first email.
On the other side, I do think we should make WS requests approval much quicker, as in the most of the new requests, it will be used for language preservation.
Gerard, may you explain what do you think with "It is the wrong mailinglist for that." What's the right method to discuss this in your opinion?
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Hoi, You are not. My bad, it shows as wikimedia, I thought it was wikimedia-l Thanks, GerardM
On 30 November 2015 at 15:24, Milos Rancic millosh@gmail.com wrote:
Gerard, we are talking here via the list langcom@lists.wikimedia.org. Am I missing something?
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 3:21 PM, Gerard Meijssen < gerard.meijssen@gmail.com> wrote:
Hoi, The right mailing list is the mailing list of the language committee. All its members are subscribed to that one. Thanks, GerardM
On 30 November 2015 at 14:14, Milos Rancic millosh@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 1:08 PM, MF-Warburg mfwarburg@googlemail.com wrote:
I don't understand. If ka.ws fulfills the activity requirements, it can be approved. Did anyone check it already?
No :) I am a bit out of regular LangCom duties, so I actually asked that inside of the first email.
On the other side, I do think we should make WS requests approval much quicker, as in the most of the new requests, it will be used for language preservation.
Gerard, may you explain what do you think with "It is the wrong mailinglist for that." What's the right method to discuss this in your opinion?
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Yes, from "Wikimedia Foundation Language Committee"... My Gmail has taken this description by default from somebody...
So, first, MF-Warburg says Georgian Wikisource should go regularly.
I suggest Neapolitan Wikisource should go fast forward.
And I suggest we amend the rules which would say something like "After the first project created, community can get Wikisource at any point of time." -- or whatever appropriate.
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 3:31 PM, Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijssen@gmail.com wrote:
Hoi, You are not. My bad, it shows as wikimedia, I thought it was wikimedia-l Thanks, GerardM
On 30 November 2015 at 15:24, Milos Rancic millosh@gmail.com wrote:
Gerard, we are talking here via the list langcom@lists.wikimedia.org. Am I missing something?
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 3:21 PM, Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijssen@gmail.com wrote:
Hoi, The right mailing list is the mailing list of the language committee. All its members are subscribed to that one. Thanks, GerardM
On 30 November 2015 at 14:14, Milos Rancic millosh@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 1:08 PM, MF-Warburg mfwarburg@googlemail.com wrote:
I don't understand. If ka.ws fulfills the activity requirements, it can be approved. Did anyone check it already?
No :) I am a bit out of regular LangCom duties, so I actually asked that inside of the first email.
On the other side, I do think we should make WS requests approval much quicker, as in the most of the new requests, it will be used for language preservation.
Gerard, may you explain what do you think with "It is the wrong mailinglist for that." What's the right method to discuss this in your opinion?
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Yes, let's approve them.
-- Amir Elisha Aharoni · אָמִיר אֱלִישָׁע אַהֲרוֹנִי http://aharoni.wordpress.com “We're living in pieces, I want to live in peace.” – T. Moore
2015-11-30 16:53 GMT+02:00 Milos Rancic millosh@gmail.com:
Yes, from "Wikimedia Foundation Language Committee"... My Gmail has taken this description by default from somebody...
So, first, MF-Warburg says Georgian Wikisource should go regularly.
I suggest Neapolitan Wikisource should go fast forward.
And I suggest we amend the rules which would say something like "After the first project created, community can get Wikisource at any point of time." -- or whatever appropriate.
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 3:31 PM, Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijssen@gmail.com wrote:
Hoi, You are not. My bad, it shows as wikimedia, I thought it was wikimedia-l Thanks, GerardM
On 30 November 2015 at 15:24, Milos Rancic millosh@gmail.com wrote:
Gerard, we are talking here via the list langcom@lists.wikimedia.org.
Am I
missing something?
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 3:21 PM, Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijssen@gmail.com wrote:
Hoi, The right mailing list is the mailing list of the language committee.
All
its members are subscribed to that one. Thanks, GerardM
On 30 November 2015 at 14:14, Milos Rancic millosh@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 1:08 PM, MF-Warburg <mfwarburg@googlemail.com
wrote:
I don't understand. If ka.ws fulfills the activity requirements, it
can
be approved. Did anyone check it already?
No :) I am a bit out of regular LangCom duties, so I actually asked
that
inside of the first email.
On the other side, I do think we should make WS requests approval much quicker, as in the most of the new requests, it will be used for
language
preservation.
Gerard, may you explain what do you think with "It is the wrong mailinglist for that." What's the right method to discuss this in your opinion?
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
I support the approval of Georgian Wikisource.
Am 2015-11-30 um 21:26 schrieb Amir E. Aharoni:
Yes, let's approve them.
-- Amir Elisha Aharoni · אָמִיר אֱלִישָׁע אַהֲרוֹנִי http://aharoni.wordpress.com “We're living in pieces, I want to live in peace.” – T. Moore
2015-11-30 16:53 GMT+02:00 Milos Rancic <millosh@gmail.com mailto:millosh@gmail.com>:
Yes, from "Wikimedia Foundation Language Committee"... My Gmail has taken this description by default from somebody... So, first, MF-Warburg says Georgian Wikisource should go regularly. I suggest Neapolitan Wikisource should go fast forward. And I suggest we amend the rules which would say something like "After the first project created, community can get Wikisource at any point of time." -- or whatever appropriate. On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 3:31 PM, Gerard Meijssen <gerard.meijssen@gmail.com <mailto:gerard.meijssen@gmail.com>> wrote: > Hoi, > You are not. My bad, it shows as wikimedia, I thought it was wikimedia-l > Thanks, > GerardM > > On 30 November 2015 at 15:24, Milos Rancic <millosh@gmail.com <mailto:millosh@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> Gerard, we are talking here via the list langcom@lists.wikimedia.org <mailto:langcom@lists.wikimedia.org>. Am I >> missing something? >> >> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 3:21 PM, Gerard Meijssen >> <gerard.meijssen@gmail.com <mailto:gerard.meijssen@gmail.com>> wrote: >>> >>> Hoi, >>> The right mailing list is the mailing list of the language committee. All >>> its members are subscribed to that one. >>> Thanks, >>> GerardM >>> >>> On 30 November 2015 at 14:14, Milos Rancic <millosh@gmail.com <mailto:millosh@gmail.com>> wrote: >>>> >>>> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 1:08 PM, MF-Warburg <mfwarburg@googlemail.com <mailto:mfwarburg@googlemail.com>> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I don't understand. If ka.ws <http://ka.ws> fulfills the activity requirements, it can >>>>> be approved. Did anyone check it already? >>>> >>>> No :) I am a bit out of regular LangCom duties, so I actually asked that >>>> inside of the first email. >>>> >>>> On the other side, I do think we should make WS requests approval much >>>> quicker, as in the most of the new requests, it will be used for language >>>> preservation. >>>> >>>> Gerard, may you explain what do you think with "It is the wrong >>>> mailinglist for that." What's the right method to discuss this in your >>>> opinion? >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Langcom mailing list >>>> Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org <mailto:Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org> >>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom >>>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Langcom mailing list >>> Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org <mailto:Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org> >>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Langcom mailing list >> Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org <mailto:Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org> >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Langcom mailing list > Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org <mailto:Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom > _______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org <mailto:Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Unfortunately, there is not very much activity: < https://tools.wmflabs.org/meta/catanalysis/?title=Georgian&cat=1&wik...
About interface translations, core and the 2 Wikisource-specific extensions are nearly complete and there is also activity on TWN < https://translatewiki.net/w/i.php?title=Special:TranslationStats&languag...; that seems OK to me.
2015-11-30 22:59 GMT+01:00 Antony Green toniogreen@web.de:
I support the approval of Georgian Wikisource.
Am 2015-11-30 um 21:26 schrieb Amir E. Aharoni:
Yes, let's approve them.
-- Amir Elisha Aharoni · אָמִיר אֱלִישָׁע אַהֲרוֹנִי http://aharoni.wordpress.com “We're living in pieces, I want to live in peace.” – T. Moore
2015-11-30 16:53 GMT+02:00 Milos Rancic millosh@gmail.com:
Yes, from "Wikimedia Foundation Language Committee"... My Gmail has taken this description by default from somebody...
So, first, MF-Warburg says Georgian Wikisource should go regularly.
I suggest Neapolitan Wikisource should go fast forward.
And I suggest we amend the rules which would say something like "After the first project created, community can get Wikisource at any point of time." -- or whatever appropriate.
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 3:31 PM, Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijssen@gmail.com wrote:
Hoi, You are not. My bad, it shows as wikimedia, I thought it was wikimedia-l Thanks, GerardM
On 30 November 2015 at 15:24, Milos Rancic < millosh@gmail.com
millosh@gmail.com> wrote:
Gerard, we are talking here via the list langcom@lists.wikimedia.org
langcom@lists.wikimedia.org. Am I
missing something?
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 3:21 PM, Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijssen@gmail.com wrote:
Hoi, The right mailing list is the mailing list of the language committee.
All
its members are subscribed to that one. Thanks, GerardM
On 30 November 2015 at 14:14, Milos Rancic millosh@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 1:08 PM, MF-Warburg <
mfwarburg@googlemail.com>
wrote: > > I don't understand. If ka.ws fulfills the activity requirements,
it can
> be approved. Did anyone check it already?
No :) I am a bit out of regular LangCom duties, so I actually asked
that
inside of the first email.
On the other side, I do think we should make WS requests approval
much
quicker, as in the most of the new requests, it will be used for
language
preservation.
Gerard, may you explain what do you think with "It is the wrong mailinglist for that." What's the right method to discuss this in
your
opinion?
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing listLangcom@lists.wikimedia.orghttps://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
-- Dr. Antony Green WE 1703 Rudolf-Seiffert-Str. 31 10369 Berlin Germany
E-mail: toniogreen@web.de Phone: +49-30-34 50 98 97 Mobile: +49-176-82 29 59 20
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
+1 from me as well
-- Oliver Stegen, PhD Linguistics Consultant, SIL Uganda-Tanzania _http://sil.academia.edu/OliverStegen_
On 30-Nov-15 11:26 PM, Amir E. Aharoni wrote:
Yes, let's approve them.
-- Amir Elisha Aharoni · אָמִיר אֱלִישָׁע אַהֲרוֹנִי http://aharoni.wordpress.com “We're living in pieces, I want to live in peace.” – T. Moore
2015-11-30 16:53 GMT+02:00 Milos Rancic <millosh@gmail.com mailto:millosh@gmail.com>:
Yes, from "Wikimedia Foundation Language Committee"... My Gmail has taken this description by default from somebody... So, first, MF-Warburg says Georgian Wikisource should go regularly. I suggest Neapolitan Wikisource should go fast forward. And I suggest we amend the rules which would say something like "After the first project created, community can get Wikisource at any point of time." -- or whatever appropriate. On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 3:31 PM, Gerard Meijssen <gerard.meijssen@gmail.com <mailto:gerard.meijssen@gmail.com>> wrote: > Hoi, > You are not. My bad, it shows as wikimedia, I thought it was wikimedia-l > Thanks, > GerardM > > On 30 November 2015 at 15:24, Milos Rancic <millosh@gmail.com <mailto:millosh@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> Gerard, we are talking here via the list langcom@lists.wikimedia.org <mailto:langcom@lists.wikimedia.org>. Am I >> missing something? >> >> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 3:21 PM, Gerard Meijssen >> <gerard.meijssen@gmail.com <mailto:gerard.meijssen@gmail.com>> wrote: >>> >>> Hoi, >>> The right mailing list is the mailing list of the language committee. All >>> its members are subscribed to that one. >>> Thanks, >>> GerardM >>> >>> On 30 November 2015 at 14:14, Milos Rancic <millosh@gmail.com <mailto:millosh@gmail.com>> wrote: >>>> >>>> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 1:08 PM, MF-Warburg <mfwarburg@googlemail.com <mailto:mfwarburg@googlemail.com>> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I don't understand. If ka.ws <http://ka.ws> fulfills the activity requirements, it can >>>>> be approved. Did anyone check it already? >>>> >>>> No :) I am a bit out of regular LangCom duties, so I actually asked that >>>> inside of the first email. >>>> >>>> On the other side, I do think we should make WS requests approval much >>>> quicker, as in the most of the new requests, it will be used for language >>>> preservation. >>>> >>>> Gerard, may you explain what do you think with "It is the wrong >>>> mailinglist for that." What's the right method to discuss this in your >>>> opinion? >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Langcom mailing list >>>> Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org <mailto:Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org> >>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom >>>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Langcom mailing list >>> Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org <mailto:Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org> >>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Langcom mailing list >> Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org <mailto:Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org> >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Langcom mailing list > Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org <mailto:Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom > _______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org <mailto:Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
What makes an own Wikisource subdomain that much better than storing the content on OldWS? The disadvantage with an automatic approval of Wikisources I see is that while a community might be big enough to maintain 1 project, it does not automatically mean they will also be able to maintain 2 of them.
Regards, Leon
Op 30 nov. 2015 om 15:53 heeft Milos Rancic millosh@gmail.com het volgende geschreven:
Yes, from "Wikimedia Foundation Language Committee"... My Gmail has taken this description by default from somebody...
So, first, MF-Warburg says Georgian Wikisource should go regularly.
I suggest Neapolitan Wikisource should go fast forward.
And I suggest we amend the rules which would say something like "After the first project created, community can get Wikisource at any point of time." -- or whatever appropriate.
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 3:31 PM, Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijssen@gmail.com wrote:
Hoi, You are not. My bad, it shows as wikimedia, I thought it was wikimedia-l Thanks, GerardM
On 30 November 2015 at 15:24, Milos Rancic millosh@gmail.com wrote:
Gerard, we are talking here via the list langcom@lists.wikimedia.org. Am I missing something?
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 3:21 PM, Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijssen@gmail.com wrote:
Hoi, The right mailing list is the mailing list of the language committee. All its members are subscribed to that one. Thanks, GerardM
On 30 November 2015 at 14:14, Milos Rancic millosh@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 1:08 PM, MF-Warburg mfwarburg@googlemail.com wrote:
I don't understand. If ka.ws fulfills the activity requirements, it can be approved. Did anyone check it already?
No :) I am a bit out of regular LangCom duties, so I actually asked that inside of the first email.
On the other side, I do think we should make WS requests approval much quicker, as in the most of the new requests, it will be used for language preservation.
Gerard, may you explain what do you think with "It is the wrong mailinglist for that." What's the right method to discuss this in your opinion?
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Hoi, There is a difference between automatic approval and automatic creation. It does not make sense to create projects because we can. It only makes sense when there are people who make the point by asking, by making an argument. Thanks, GerardM
On 1 December 2015 at 00:06, Leon Liesener leon.liesener@wikipedia.de wrote:
What makes an own Wikisource subdomain that much better than storing the content on OldWS? The disadvantage with an automatic approval of Wikisources I see is that while a community might be big enough to maintain 1 project, it does not automatically mean they will also be able to maintain 2 of them.
Regards, Leon
Op 30 nov. 2015 om 15:53 heeft Milos Rancic millosh@gmail.com het
volgende geschreven:
Yes, from "Wikimedia Foundation Language Committee"... My Gmail has taken this description by default from somebody...
So, first, MF-Warburg says Georgian Wikisource should go regularly.
I suggest Neapolitan Wikisource should go fast forward.
And I suggest we amend the rules which would say something like "After the first project created, community can get Wikisource at any point of time." -- or whatever appropriate.
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 3:31 PM, Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijssen@gmail.com wrote:
Hoi, You are not. My bad, it shows as wikimedia, I thought it was wikimedia-l Thanks, GerardM
On 30 November 2015 at 15:24, Milos Rancic millosh@gmail.com wrote:
Gerard, we are talking here via the list langcom@lists.wikimedia.org.
Am I
missing something?
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 3:21 PM, Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijssen@gmail.com wrote:
Hoi, The right mailing list is the mailing list of the language committee.
All
its members are subscribed to that one. Thanks, GerardM
On 30 November 2015 at 14:14, Milos Rancic millosh@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 1:08 PM, MF-Warburg <
mfwarburg@googlemail.com>
wrote: > > I don't understand. If ka.ws fulfills the activity requirements,
it can
> be approved. Did anyone check it already?
No :) I am a bit out of regular LangCom duties, so I actually asked
that
inside of the first email.
On the other side, I do think we should make WS requests approval
much
quicker, as in the most of the new requests, it will be used for
language
preservation.
Gerard, may you explain what do you think with "It is the wrong mailinglist for that." What's the right method to discuss this in
your
opinion?
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom