What makes an own Wikisource subdomain that much better than storing the content on OldWS?
The disadvantage with an automatic approval of Wikisources I see is that while a community might be big enough to maintain 1 project, it does not automatically mean they will also be able to maintain 2 of them.
Regards,
Leon
> Op 30 nov. 2015 om 15:53 heeft Milos Rancic <millosh@gmail.com> het volgende geschreven:
>
> Yes, from "Wikimedia Foundation Language Committee"... My Gmail has
> taken this description by default from somebody...
>
> So, first, MF-Warburg says Georgian Wikisource should go regularly.
>
> I suggest Neapolitan Wikisource should go fast forward.
>
> And I suggest we amend the rules which would say something like "After
> the first project created, community can get Wikisource at any point
> of time." -- or whatever appropriate.
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 3:31 PM, Gerard Meijssen
> <gerard.meijssen@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hoi,
>> You are not. My bad, it shows as wikimedia, I thought it was wikimedia-l
>> Thanks,
>> GerardM
>>
>>> On 30 November 2015 at 15:24, Milos Rancic <millosh@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Gerard, we are talking here via the list langcom@lists.wikimedia.org. Am I
>>> missing something?
>>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 3:21 PM, Gerard Meijssen
>>> <gerard.meijssen@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hoi,
>>>> The right mailing list is the mailing list of the language committee. All
>>>> its members are subscribed to that one.
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> GerardM
>>>>
>>>>> On 30 November 2015 at 14:14, Milos Rancic <millosh@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 1:08 PM, MF-Warburg <mfwarburg@googlemail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't understand. If ka.ws fulfills the activity requirements, it can
>>>>>> be approved. Did anyone check it already?
>>>>>
>>>>> No :) I am a bit out of regular LangCom duties, so I actually asked that
>>>>> inside of the first email.
>>>>>
>>>>> On the other side, I do think we should make WS requests approval much
>>>>> quicker, as in the most of the new requests, it will be used for language
>>>>> preservation.
>>>>>
>>>>> Gerard, may you explain what do you think with "It is the wrong
>>>>> mailinglist for that." What's the right method to discuss this in your
>>>>> opinion?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Langcom mailing list
>>>>> Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org
>>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Langcom mailing list
>>>> Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org
>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Langcom mailing list
>>> Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org
>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Langcom mailing list
>> Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
>
> _______________________________________________
> Langcom mailing list
> Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom