Hoi,
There is a difference between automatic approval and automatic creation. It
does not make sense to create projects because we can. It only makes sense
when there are people who make the point by asking, by making an argument.
Thanks,
GerardM
On 1 December 2015 at 00:06, Leon Liesener <leon.liesener(a)wikipedia.de>
wrote:
What makes an own Wikisource subdomain that much
better than storing the
content on OldWS?
The disadvantage with an automatic approval of Wikisources I see is that
while a community might be big enough to maintain 1 project, it does not
automatically mean they will also be able to maintain 2 of them.
Regards,
Leon
Op 30 nov. 2015 om 15:53 heeft Milos Rancic
<millosh(a)gmail.com> het
volgende geschreven:
Yes, from "Wikimedia Foundation Language Committee"... My Gmail has
taken this description by default from somebody...
So, first, MF-Warburg says Georgian Wikisource should go regularly.
I suggest Neapolitan Wikisource should go fast forward.
And I suggest we amend the rules which would say something like "After
the first project created, community can get Wikisource at any point
of time." -- or whatever appropriate.
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 3:31 PM, Gerard Meijssen
<gerard.meijssen(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Hoi,
> You are not. My bad, it shows as wikimedia, I thought it was wikimedia-l
> Thanks,
> GerardM
>
>> On 30 November 2015 at 15:24, Milos Rancic <millosh(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Gerard, we are talking here via the list langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org.
Am
I
>> missing something?
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 3:21 PM, Gerard Meijssen
>> <gerard.meijssen(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hoi,
>>> The right mailing list is the mailing list of the language committee.
All
>>> its members are subscribed to that
one.
>>> Thanks,
>>> GerardM
>>>
>>>> On 30 November 2015 at 14:14, Milos Rancic <millosh(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 1:08 PM, MF-Warburg <
mfwarburg(a)googlemail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't understand. If ka.ws fulfills the activity requirements,
it can
>>>>> be approved. Did anyone check
it already?
>>>>
>>>> No :) I am a bit out of regular LangCom duties, so I actually asked
that
>>>> inside of the first email.
>>>>
>>>> On the other side, I do think we should make WS requests approval
much
>>>> quicker, as in the most of the
new requests, it will be used for
language
>>>> preservation.
>>>>
>>>> Gerard, may you explain what do you think with "It is the wrong
>>>> mailinglist for that." What's the right method to discuss this
in
your
>> opinion?
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Langcom mailing list
>> Langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Langcom mailing list
> Langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
Langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
Langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
Langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
Langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom