Hi all,
I think Ingush Wikipedia can be approved, from the activity viewpoint. The
translation of the most-used messages is complete (<
http://tools.wmflabs.org/robin/?tool=codelookup&code=inh>) and there has
been a quite high activity since almost ten months now <
https://tools.wmflabs.org/meta/catanalysis/index.php?cat=0&title=Wp/inh&wik…
>.
Now we would of course need verificiation of the content. Searching the
archives, I found a mail from Amir from 10 November 2011. Back then, a
linguist had said the language in the test-wiki was not quite what would be
expected from literary Ingush. However, the current editors are all
different from the ones that were active five years ago.
Amir, could you check with that linguist or someone else from the Ingush
State University again about the quality of the content?
Best regards, MF-W
Hi,
I received a few requests to check the status of Western Balochi incubator
(bgn).
The code bgn is legit, the translation of most-used messages is complete,
and the activity in the incubator is reasonable. A lot of pages are
written; many are just one or two lines long, but I don't think that I mind.
Do we want to verify that it's the right language?
--
Amir Elisha Aharoni · אָמִיר אֱלִישָׁע אַהֲרוֹנִי
http://aharoni.wordpress.com
“We're living in pieces,
I want to live in peace.” – T. Moore
Hi Langcom team,
The articles on Doteli Wikipedia has been growing at good rate now. Active
number of editors also growing on.
There is a good numbers of Doteli language experts and scholars resides in
Kathmandu, Nepal and western part of Nepal. Some of them were touched with
me. I will keep them in this thread, so that they can verify the content
written in Doteli incubator project.
The statistics shows the activity of Doteli Wikipedia.
The wiki has exceeded more than *2K* articles in various topics. Please
follow the link below.
Main page of Doteli Incubator project
<https://incubator.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wp/dty/Main_Page>
The Doteli Wikipedia activity here:
Doteli incubator stats
<https://tools.wmflabs.org/meta/catanalysis/index.php?cat=0&title=Wp/dty&wik…>
With Best Regards
Janak Bhatta
Kathmandu, Nepal
+977-9851100522
On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 5:07 PM, Biplab Anand <biplabanand(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Biplab Anand <biplabanand(a)gmail.com>
> Date: Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 6:49 PM
> Subject: Re: [Langcom] Doteli Wikipedia
> To: Wikimedia Foundation Language Committee <langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
>
>
> Hi Amir and all,
> AFAICT there is good numbers of Doteli language experts resides in
> Kathmandu, Nepal and westen part of Nepal. I hope Janak will keep them in
> this thread, so they can verify the content written in Doteli incubator
> project.
>
> Biplab
>
> Hi Janak,
>
> Thanks for your email.
>
> I took a look at the statistics and at some pages.
>
> The activity statistics look quite good, although they are lower for this
> month. The most important is to keep this incubator activity as high as
> possible.
>
> The translatewiki statistics look good as well.
>
> The articles look OK as far as I can tell, but I don't actually know the
> language, so I cannot verify it further. Is there anybody in the Langcom
> who can find a Doteli expert?
>
> --
> Amir Elisha Aharoni · אָמִיר אֱלִישָׁע אַהֲרוֹנִי
> http://aharoni.wordpress.com
> “We're living in pieces,
> I want to live in peace.” – T. Moore
> Hi Janak,
>
> Thanks for your email.
>
> I took a look at the statistics and at some pages.
>
> The activity statistics look quite good, although they are lower for this
> month. The most important is to keep this incubator activity as high as
> possible.
>
> The translatewiki statistics look good as well.
>
> The articles look OK as far as I can tell, but I don't actually know the
> language, so I cannot verify it further. Is there anybody in the Langcom
> who can find a Doteli expert?
>
>
> --
> Amir Elisha Aharoni · אָמִיר אֱלִישָׁע אַהֲרוֹנִי
> http://aharoni.wordpress.com
> “We're living in pieces,
> I want to live in peace.” – T. Moore
>
> 2016-10-13 8:08 GMT+03:00 Janak Bhatta <janak.bhatta.np(a)gmail.com>:
>
>> Dear Language Committee,
>>
>> We are glad to share you about the growth in contribution in Doteli
>> Wikipedia Incubation recent days.
>>
>> The Incubator project of Doteli Wikipedia seems growing day by day and
>> the community members are really doing great stuff in incubator projects
>> and translate wiki to move this project out from incubator.
>>
>> The wiki has exceeded more than 1K articles in various topics. Please
>> follow the link below.
>> Main page of Doteli Incubator project
>> <https://incubator.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wp/dty/Main_Page>
>>
>> The Doteli Wikipedia activity here:
>> Doteli incubator stats
>> <https://tools.wmflabs.org/meta/catanalysis/index.php?cat=0&title=Wp/dty&wik…>
>>
>>
>> We have been communicating various organizations related to Doteli
>> language for collaboration. They have shown interest to support the Wiki to
>> make it a rich Wikipedia.
>>
>> Now, we have got a mentionable number of contributors, number of articles
>> and considerably good interface translation. Therefor we request to publish
>> Doteli Wikipedia out from the incubation. We assure to give qualitative
>> and quantitative contribution in this wiki.
>>
>> With best regards
>> Janak Bhatta
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Langcom mailing list
>> Langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Langcom mailing list
> Langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
>
>
>
There is a request for Wikipedia in "Lingua Franca Nova", which is a
constructed language with an ISO 639-3 code. <
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikipedia_Lingua…>
I'm bringing it up because there is currently a very active contributor on
Incubator.
A previous request was rejected in 2008. Of course, the Language Proposal
Policy says:
If the proposal is for an artificial language such as Esperanto, it
must have a reasonable degree of recognition as determined by discussion
(this requirement is being discussed by the language committee).
What are your opinions about the degree of recognition? Can the language be
eligible or should it be rejected? I have never heard of this language
before, but I am of course only a linguistic layman.