I support the approval of Georgian Wikisource.
Am 2015-11-30 um 21:26 schrieb Amir E. Aharoni:
Yes, let's approve them.
-- Amir Elisha Aharoni · אָמִיר אֱלִישָׁע אַהֲרוֹנִי http://aharoni.wordpress.com “We're living in pieces, I want to live in peace.” – T. Moore
2015-11-30 16:53 GMT+02:00 Milos Rancic <millosh@gmail.com mailto:millosh@gmail.com>:
Yes, from "Wikimedia Foundation Language Committee"... My Gmail has taken this description by default from somebody... So, first, MF-Warburg says Georgian Wikisource should go regularly. I suggest Neapolitan Wikisource should go fast forward. And I suggest we amend the rules which would say something like "After the first project created, community can get Wikisource at any point of time." -- or whatever appropriate. On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 3:31 PM, Gerard Meijssen <gerard.meijssen@gmail.com <mailto:gerard.meijssen@gmail.com>> wrote: > Hoi, > You are not. My bad, it shows as wikimedia, I thought it was wikimedia-l > Thanks, > GerardM > > On 30 November 2015 at 15:24, Milos Rancic <millosh@gmail.com <mailto:millosh@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> Gerard, we are talking here via the list langcom@lists.wikimedia.org <mailto:langcom@lists.wikimedia.org>. Am I >> missing something? >> >> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 3:21 PM, Gerard Meijssen >> <gerard.meijssen@gmail.com <mailto:gerard.meijssen@gmail.com>> wrote: >>> >>> Hoi, >>> The right mailing list is the mailing list of the language committee. All >>> its members are subscribed to that one. >>> Thanks, >>> GerardM >>> >>> On 30 November 2015 at 14:14, Milos Rancic <millosh@gmail.com <mailto:millosh@gmail.com>> wrote: >>>> >>>> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 1:08 PM, MF-Warburg <mfwarburg@googlemail.com <mailto:mfwarburg@googlemail.com>> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I don't understand. If ka.ws <http://ka.ws> fulfills the activity requirements, it can >>>>> be approved. Did anyone check it already? >>>> >>>> No :) I am a bit out of regular LangCom duties, so I actually asked that >>>> inside of the first email. >>>> >>>> On the other side, I do think we should make WS requests approval much >>>> quicker, as in the most of the new requests, it will be used for language >>>> preservation. >>>> >>>> Gerard, may you explain what do you think with "It is the wrong >>>> mailinglist for that." What's the right method to discuss this in your >>>> opinion? >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Langcom mailing list >>>> Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org <mailto:Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org> >>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom >>>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Langcom mailing list >>> Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org <mailto:Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org> >>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Langcom mailing list >> Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org <mailto:Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org> >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Langcom mailing list > Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org <mailto:Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom > _______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org <mailto:Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom