On 25 Aug 2015, at 18:34, Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijssen@gmail.com wrote:
Linguistically it is the same language. There is no reason why it needs to be a different code. The standard allows for a code that is different. The code en-simple is not in conformance with the standard.
Please explain what exactly you mean. “The standard (which?) allows for a code that is different (from what?)”. How is “en-simple” not in conformance with “the standard” (which?)?
Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/