On 25 Aug 2015, at 18:34, Gerard Meijssen <gerard.meijssen(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Linguistically it is the same language. There is no reason why it needs to be a different
code. The standard allows for a code that is different. The code en-simple is not in
conformance with the standard.
Please explain what exactly you mean. “The standard (which?) allows for a code that is
different (from what?)”. How is “en-simple” not in conformance with “the standard”
Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/