We've had a request for a Wikisource in Livvi-Karelian [meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikisource_Livvi-Karelian https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikisource_Livvi-Karelian]. Since there is already a Wikipedia in that language [olo.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piäsivu https://olo.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pi%C3%A4sivu] it's automatically eligible, isn't it?
Antony
Yes. The language is a valid one.
On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 11:05 PM, Antony Green toniogreen@web.de wrote:
We've had a request for a Wikisource in Livvi-Karelian [meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikisource_Livvi-Karelian]. Since there is already a Wikipedia in that language [olo.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piäsivu] it's automatically eligible, isn't it?
Antony
-- Dr. Antony Green Rudolf-Seiffert-Str. 31 WE 1703 10369 Berlin, Germany E-Mail: toniogreen@web.de Mobile: +49-176-82295920
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
OK, thanks. While we're about it, there are several other pending requests for Wikisources that I would like to take care of:
* Old Norwegian [meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikisource_Old_Norwegian https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikisource_Old_Norwegian] should be rejected. It has no code and is just a dialect of Old Norse. Texts could be listed either at Norwegian Wikisource or in the Old Norse section of Multilingual Wikisource [wikisource.org/wiki/Main_Page/Norr%C5%93nt https://wikisource.org/wiki/Main_Page/Norr%C5%93nt]
* Kurdish [meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikisource_Kurdish https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikisource_Kurdish] is surely eligible.
* Neapolitan [meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikisource_Neapolitan https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikisource_Neapolitan] should be eligible. The only argument against it is that Italian Wikisource already hosts pages in Neapolitan [it.wikisource.org/wiki/Categoria:Testi_in_napoletano https://it.wikisource.org/wiki/Categoria:Testi_in_napoletano]; but the Neapolitan section of Multilingual Wikisource [wikisource.org/wiki/Category:Napulitano https://wikisource.org/wiki/Category:Napulitano] has more texts, and the discussion suggests that Neapolitan editors would prefer their own Wikisource rather than contributing to Italian Wikisource.
* Burmese (Myanmar) [meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikisource_Myanmar https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikisource_Myanmar] is surely eligible.
* Zazaki [meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikisource_Zazaki https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikisource_Zazaki] is surely eligible; it has its own Wikipedia already [diq.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pela_Seri https://diq.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pela_Seri]
* Lojban [meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikisource_Lojban https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikisource_Lojban] is surely eligible; it has its own Wikipedia already [jbo.wikipedia.org/wiki/uikipedi'as:ralju https://jbo.wikipedia.org/wiki/uikipedi%27as:ralju].
* Manchu [meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikisource_Manchu https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikisource_Manchu] seems to be eligible (the native speaker requirement being waived for Wikisources), though I'm not sure if we're technically able to host a Wikisource in a vertically written language yet.
* Uzbek [meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikisource_Uzbek https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikisource_Uzbek] is surely eligible.
* Western Panjabi [meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikisource_Western_Punjabi https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikisource_Western_Punjabi] is surely eligible; it has its own Wikipedia already [pnb.wikipedia.org/wiki/پہلا_صفہ https://pnb.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D9%BE%DB%81%D9%84%D8%A7_%D8%B5%D9%81%DB%81].
* Pashto [meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikisource_Pashto https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikisource_Pashto] is surely eligible.
Are there any objections to my rejecting Old Norwegian and marking eligible all of the others mentioned above, as well as Livvi-Karelian?
Antony
Am 2017-04-19 um 23:17 schrieb Milos Rancic:
Yes. The language is a valid one.
On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 11:05 PM, Antony Green toniogreen@web.de wrote:
We've had a request for a Wikisource in Livvi-Karelian [meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikisource_Livvi-Karelian]. Since there is already a Wikipedia in that language [olo.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piäsivu] it's automatically eligible, isn't it?
Antony
-- Dr. Antony Green Rudolf-Seiffert-Str. 31 WE 1703 10369 Berlin, Germany E-Mail: toniogreen@web.de Mobile: +49-176-82295920
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Thank you for this thankless clerical work, Antony.
On 19 Apr 2017, at 22:56, Antony Green toniogreen@web.de wrote:
OK, thanks. While we're about it, there are several other pending requests for Wikisources that I would like to take care of:
Old Norwegian [meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikisource_Old_Norwegian] should be rejected. It has no code and is just a dialect of Old Norse. Texts could be listed either at Norwegian Wikisource or in the Old Norse section of Multilingual Wikisource [wikisource.org/wiki/Main_Page/Norr%C5%93nt]
Kurdish [meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikisource_Kurdish] is surely eligible.
Neapolitan [meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikisource_Neapolitan] should be eligible. The only argument against it is that Italian Wikisource already hosts pages in Neapolitan [it.wikisource.org/wiki/Categoria:Testi_in_napoletano]; but the Neapolitan section of Multilingual Wikisource [wikisource.org/wiki/Category:Napulitano] has more texts, and the discussion suggests that Neapolitan editors would prefer their own Wikisource rather than contributing to Italian Wikisource.
Burmese (Myanmar) [meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikisource_Myanmar] is surely eligible.
Zazaki [meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikisource_Zazaki] is surely eligible; it has its own Wikipedia already [diq.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pela_Seri]
Lojban [meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikisource_Lojban] is surely eligible; it has its own Wikipedia already [jbo.wikipedia.org/wiki/uikipedi'as:ralju].
Manchu [meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikisource_Manchu] seems to be eligible (the native speaker requirement being waived for Wikisources), though I'm not sure if we're technically able to host a Wikisource in a vertically written language yet.
Uzbek [meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikisource_Uzbek] is surely eligible.
Western Panjabi [meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikisource_Western_Punjabi] is surely eligible; it has its own Wikipedia already [pnb.wikipedia.org/wiki/پہلا_صفہ].
Pashto [meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikisource_Pashto] is surely eligible.
Are there any objections to my rejecting Old Norwegian and marking eligible all of the others mentioned above, as well as Livvi-Karelian?
Antony
Am 2017-04-19 um 23:17 schrieb Milos Rancic:
Yes. The language is a valid one.
On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 11:05 PM, Antony Green toniogreen@web.de wrote:
We've had a request for a Wikisource in Livvi-Karelian [meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikisource_Livvi-Karelian]. Since there is already a Wikipedia in that language [olo.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piäsivu] it's automatically eligible, isn't it?
Antony
-- Dr. Antony Green Rudolf-Seiffert-Str. 31 WE 1703 10369 Berlin, Germany E-Mail: toniogreen@web.de
Mobile: +49-176-82295920
Langcom mailing list
Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list
Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
-- Dr. Antony Green Rudolf-Seiffert-Str. 31 WE 1703 10369 Berlin, Germany E-Mail: toniogreen@web.de
Mobile: +49-176-82295920
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
I've gone ahead and rejected Old Norwegian and made all the other Wikisources mentioned eligible.
Am 2017-04-20 um 00:51 schrieb Michael Everson:
Thank you for this thankless clerical work, Antony.
On 19 Apr 2017, at 22:56, Antony Green toniogreen@web.de wrote:
OK, thanks. While we're about it, there are several other pending requests for Wikisources that I would like to take care of:
Old Norwegian [meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikisource_Old_Norwegian] should be rejected. It has no code and is just a dialect of Old Norse. Texts could be listed either at Norwegian Wikisource or in the Old Norse section of Multilingual Wikisource [wikisource.org/wiki/Main_Page/Norr%C5%93nt]
Kurdish [meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikisource_Kurdish] is surely eligible.
Neapolitan [meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikisource_Neapolitan] should be eligible. The only argument against it is that Italian Wikisource already hosts pages in Neapolitan [it.wikisource.org/wiki/Categoria:Testi_in_napoletano]; but the Neapolitan section of Multilingual Wikisource [wikisource.org/wiki/Category:Napulitano] has more texts, and the discussion suggests that Neapolitan editors would prefer their own Wikisource rather than contributing to Italian Wikisource.
Burmese (Myanmar) [meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikisource_Myanmar] is surely eligible.
Zazaki [meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikisource_Zazaki] is surely eligible; it has its own Wikipedia already [diq.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pela_Seri]
Lojban [meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikisource_Lojban] is surely eligible; it has its own Wikipedia already [jbo.wikipedia.org/wiki/uikipedi'as:ralju].
Manchu [meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikisource_Manchu] seems to be eligible (the native speaker requirement being waived for Wikisources), though I'm not sure if we're technically able to host a Wikisource in a vertically written language yet.
Uzbek [meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikisource_Uzbek] is surely eligible.
Western Panjabi [meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikisource_Western_Punjabi] is surely eligible; it has its own Wikipedia already [pnb.wikipedia.org/wiki/پہلا_صفہ].
Pashto [meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikisource_Pashto] is surely eligible.
Are there any objections to my rejecting Old Norwegian and marking eligible all of the others mentioned above, as well as Livvi-Karelian?
Antony
Am 2017-04-19 um 23:17 schrieb Milos Rancic:
Yes. The language is a valid one.
On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 11:05 PM, Antony Green toniogreen@web.de wrote:
We've had a request for a Wikisource in Livvi-Karelian [meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikisource_Livvi-Karelian]. Since there is already a Wikipedia in that language [olo.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piäsivu] it's automatically eligible, isn't it?
Antony
-- Dr. Antony Green Rudolf-Seiffert-Str. 31 WE 1703 10369 Berlin, Germany E-Mail: toniogreen@web.de
Mobile: +49-176-82295920
Langcom mailing list
Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list
Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
-- Dr. Antony Green Rudolf-Seiffert-Str. 31 WE 1703 10369 Berlin, Germany E-Mail: toniogreen@web.de
Mobile: +49-176-82295920
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Thanks, Antony! I concur (albeit belatedly). Oliver
On 22-Apr-17 01:03, Antony Green wrote:
I've gone ahead and rejected Old Norwegian and made all the other Wikisources mentioned eligible.
Am 2017-04-20 um 00:51 schrieb Michael Everson:
Thank you for this thankless clerical work, Antony.
On 19 Apr 2017, at 22:56, Antony Green toniogreen@web.de wrote:
OK, thanks. While we're about it, there are several other pending requests for Wikisources that I would like to take care of:
- Old Norwegian
[meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikisource_Old_Norwegian] should be rejected. It has no code and is just a dialect of Old Norse. Texts could be listed either at Norwegian Wikisource or in the Old Norse section of Multilingual Wikisource [wikisource.org/wiki/Main_Page/Norr%C5%93nt]
- Kurdish
[meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikisource_Kurdish] is surely eligible.
- Neapolitan
[meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikisource_Neapolitan] should be eligible. The only argument against it is that Italian Wikisource already hosts pages in Neapolitan [it.wikisource.org/wiki/Categoria:Testi_in_napoletano]; but the Neapolitan section of Multilingual Wikisource [wikisource.org/wiki/Category:Napulitano] has more texts, and the discussion suggests that Neapolitan editors would prefer their own Wikisource rather than contributing to Italian Wikisource.
- Burmese (Myanmar)
[meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikisource_Myanmar] is surely eligible.
- Zazaki
[meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikisource_Zazaki] is surely eligible; it has its own Wikipedia already [diq.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pela_Seri]
- Lojban
[meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikisource_Lojban] is surely eligible; it has its own Wikipedia already [jbo.wikipedia.org/wiki/uikipedi'as:ralju].
- Manchu
[meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikisource_Manchu] seems to be eligible (the native speaker requirement being waived for Wikisources), though I'm not sure if we're technically able to host a Wikisource in a vertically written language yet.
- Uzbek
[meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikisource_Uzbek] is surely eligible.
- Western Panjabi
[meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikisource_Western_Punjabi] is surely eligible; it has its own Wikipedia already [pnb.wikipedia.org/wiki/پہلا_صفہ].
- Pashto
[meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikisource_Pashto] is surely eligible.
Are there any objections to my rejecting Old Norwegian and marking eligible all of the others mentioned above, as well as Livvi-Karelian?
Antony
Am 2017-04-19 um 23:17 schrieb Milos Rancic:
Yes. The language is a valid one.
On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 11:05 PM, Antony Green toniogreen@web.de wrote:
We've had a request for a Wikisource in Livvi-Karelian [meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikisource_Livvi-Karelian].
Since there is already a Wikipedia in that language [olo.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piäsivu] it's automatically eligible, isn't it?
Antony
-- Dr. Antony Green Rudolf-Seiffert-Str. 31 WE 1703 10369 Berlin, Germany E-Mail: toniogreen@web.de
Mobile: +49-176-82295920
Langcom mailing list
Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list
Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
-- Dr. Antony Green Rudolf-Seiffert-Str. 31 WE 1703 10369 Berlin, Germany E-Mail: toniogreen@web.de
Mobile: +49-176-82295920
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom