Initially, before I read the content of the page, I've been thinking to put this as a proposal. However, not just that there are no reasonable linguistic basis, but I see the proposal [1] as edgy in the sense of trolling.
My comment with rejection is:
According to the article Reforms of Portuguese orthography [2], Portuguese and Brazilian philologists and institutions support unified language. Consequently, the basis for the request doesn't exist.
[1] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikipedia_Europea... [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reforms_of_Portuguese_orthography
Very good.
2017-01-23 21:49 GMT+01:00 Milos Rancic millosh@gmail.com:
Initially, before I read the content of the page, I've been thinking to put this as a proposal. However, not just that there are no reasonable linguistic basis, but I see the proposal [1] as edgy in the sense of trolling.
My comment with rejection is:
According to the article Reforms of Portuguese orthography [2], Portuguese and Brazilian philologists and institutions support unified language. Consequently, the basis for the request doesn't exist.
[1] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_ languages/Wikipedia_European_Portuguese_3 [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reforms_of_Portuguese_orthography
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom