Langcom-l is old, langcom@ is new. Am 27.04.2015 05:42 schrieb "Oliver Stegen" oliver_stegen@sil.org:
***Looks like I should have sent this to LangCom-L straight away rather than to LangCom only, right? Which is the old, and which is the new?***
Re new members: How am I supposed to gauge whether a newly proposed LangCom member is proactive enough to pass muster?
In more general terms: Do we need a discussion on this list about our functionality? I've just seen that there was a discussion about LangCom on Meta about a month ago ( https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikimedia_Forum&diff=prev&a... ). Fine, so I'm considered active - but I'm only really active on this mailing list (and on sw:wp and by extension on wikidata but that's a different matter). If someone contacts me on a talk page, chances are that I won't respond. And I also don't feel comfortable engaging in discussions outside of this mailing list.
SO: Is it sufficient for me to react to posts on this mailing list which concern my agreement or disagreement with regard to a new language project? Or do you, my fellow LangCom members, prefer for me to resign if I don't feel able to be more proactive than that?
Fwiw, Oliver
On 16-Apr-15 9:22 AM, Santhosh Thottingal wrote:
-------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: Request for Membership Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 06:19:01 +0000 (UTC) From: Rehmat Aziz Chitrali rachitrali@yahoo.com rachitrali@yahoo.com Reply-To: Rehmat Aziz Chitrali rachitrali@yahoo.com rachitrali@yahoo.com To: langcom@lists.wikimedia.org langcom@lists.wikimedia.org langcom@lists.wikimedia.org
Dear sirs,
I am Test Wiki Administrator at Wiki Incubator projects Pakistan. I want to become member of Language Committee from Pakistan.
Rehmat Aziz Chitrali,Gold Medalist Linguist & Culture Researcher
Langcom mailing listLangcom@lists.wikimedia.orghttps://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom-l mailing list Langcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom-l