The changes I proposed to LPP, which I first shared with the rest of the Committee on the private email list on 3 December 2018, will be posted on Meta for discussion a little later today (my time). The page containing the (proposed) revised policy is herehttps://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Language_proposal_policy/2-2019_proposed_revision; discussion will be on that page's talk page. I intend to leave the discussion up until the end of February, unless discussion really fades out before then.
Steven
Sent from Outlookhttp://aka.ms/weboutlook
My irritation continues in this thread. In the discussion on the private list, I have made several remarks about the proposed changes. I never received an answer to them and now on the Meta page I see that *none *of them have been reflected in the draft. Yes, sometimes Langcom discussions attract a low level of participation, but then you have to at least work with what you get and not ignore it. What is happening?
Am Mo., 4. Feb. 2019 um 21:30 Uhr schrieb Steven White < Koala19890@hotmail.com>:
The changes I proposed to LPP, which I first shared with the rest of the Committee on the private email list on 3 December 2018, will be posted on Meta for discussion a little later today (my time). The page containing the (proposed) revised policy is here https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Language_proposal_policy/2-2019_proposed_revision; discussion will be on that page's talk page. I intend to leave the discussion up until the end of February, unless discussion really fades out before then.
Steven
Sent from Outlook http://aka.ms/weboutlook _______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom