Hello all,
I would like to propose the approval of the Tulu Wiktionary (tcywiktionary) [1][2]. The localization is good [3] (coverage of "most used messages" can be improved, but there is an ongoing localization effort), and the activity level has been good for the last three months [4]. You may notice that there was a lot of activity for several months when the test wiki was started in 2018 until about early 2020, and then a drop in activity, but it has risen again lately, and has several of the same users returning to activity, which IMO is a good sign. There is already a Tulu Wikipedia, so no verification should be necessary.
[1] https://incubator.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wt/tcy [2] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wiktionary_Tulu [3] https://codelookup.toolforge.org/tcy [4] https://meta.toolforge.org/catanalysis/index.php?cat=0&title=Wt/tcy&...
Hi, is there any news regarding the approval of Tulu Wiktionary (tcywiktionary), there are some users who are making edits sporadically on incubator since 2018
Jon Harald Søby wrote:
Hello all,
I would like to propose the approval of the Tulu Wiktionary (tcywiktionary) [1][2]. The localization is good [3] (coverage of "most used messages" can be improved, but there is an ongoing localization effort), and the activity level has been good for the last three months [4]. You may notice that there was a lot of activity for several months when the test wiki was started in 2018 until about early 2020, and then a drop in activity, but it has risen again lately, and has several of the same users returning to activity, which IMO is a good sign. There is already a Tulu Wikipedia, so no verification should be necessary.
[1] https://incubator.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wt/tcy [2] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wiktionary_Tulu [3] https://codelookup.toolforge.org/tcy [4] https://meta.toolforge.org/catanalysis/index.php?cat=0&title=Wt/tcy&...