Hi all,
I would like to propose the approval of the Dagbani Wikipedia. The activity [1] is really good and stable, and the most used messages have all been translated [2] (this was finished today actually – there were some 40ish untranslated messages a couple of days ago, so I prodded Sadik Shahadu, one of the main contributors, to complete them, and he responded very swiftly). The community is really active not only on the Incubator, but in various other areas of Wikimedia as well – as some of you may have heard, it was selected as one of the focus languages for the Abstract Wikipedia project [3]. In addition, they also have an active Wikimedia User Group [4], which I believe is the only language-based user group for a language that's still in the Incubator.
As for external validation, I am not sure that is necessary in this case, but according to Amir, who has been helping them out with some things, it should be rather easy to obtain if any of the committee members deem it necessary.
[1] https://meta.toolforge.org/catanalysis/index.php?cat=0&title=Wp/dag&... [2] https://robin.toolforge.org/?tool=codelookup&code=dag [3] https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Lexicographical_data/Focus_languages [4] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Dagbani_Wikimedians_User_Group
Looks good to me. I had an eye on it already but so far the most-used messages were always incomplete.
Am Sa., 24. Apr. 2021 um 19:09 Uhr schrieb Jon Harald Søby <jhsoby@gmail.com
:
Hi all,
I would like to propose the approval of the Dagbani Wikipedia. The activity [1] is really good and stable, and the most used messages have all been translated [2] (this was finished today actually – there were some 40ish untranslated messages a couple of days ago, so I prodded Sadik Shahadu, one of the main contributors, to complete them, and he responded very swiftly). The community is really active not only on the Incubator, but in various other areas of Wikimedia as well – as some of you may have heard, it was selected as one of the focus languages for the Abstract Wikipedia project [3]. In addition, they also have an active Wikimedia User Group [4], which I believe is the only language-based user group for a language that's still in the Incubator.
As for external validation, I am not sure that is necessary in this case, but according to Amir, who has been helping them out with some things, it should be rather easy to obtain if any of the committee members deem it necessary.
Maybe - especially in this case? ;)
[1] https://meta.toolforge.org/catanalysis/index.php?cat=0&title=Wp/dag&... [2] https://robin.toolforge.org/?tool=codelookup&code=dag [3] https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Lexicographical_data/Focus_languages [4] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Dagbani_Wikimedians_User_Group
-- mvh Jon Harald Søby _______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
I have been watching the activities of Wp/dag, and I think it is steady and stable. I believe that if there are no other issues, there will be no issues with approval.
Sotiale
본 이메일은 Avast로 보호되는 안전한 컴퓨터에서 발송되었습니다. www.avast.com https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
2021년 4월 26일 (월) 오전 9:21, MF-Warburg mfwarburg@googlemail.com님이 작성:
Looks good to me. I had an eye on it already but so far the most-used messages were always incomplete.
Am Sa., 24. Apr. 2021 um 19:09 Uhr schrieb Jon Harald Søby < jhsoby@gmail.com>:
Hi all,
I would like to propose the approval of the Dagbani Wikipedia. The activity [1] is really good and stable, and the most used messages have all been translated [2] (this was finished today actually – there were some 40ish untranslated messages a couple of days ago, so I prodded Sadik Shahadu, one of the main contributors, to complete them, and he responded very swiftly). The community is really active not only on the Incubator, but in various other areas of Wikimedia as well – as some of you may have heard, it was selected as one of the focus languages for the Abstract Wikipedia project [3]. In addition, they also have an active Wikimedia User Group [4], which I believe is the only language-based user group for a language that's still in the Incubator.
As for external validation, I am not sure that is necessary in this case, but according to Amir, who has been helping them out with some things, it should be rather easy to obtain if any of the committee members deem it necessary.
Maybe - especially in this case? ;)
[1] https://meta.toolforge.org/catanalysis/index.php?cat=0&title=Wp/dag&... [2] https://robin.toolforge.org/?tool=codelookup&code=dag [3] https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Lexicographical_data/Focus_languages [4] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Dagbani_Wikimedians_User_Group
-- mvh Jon Harald Søby _______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Hoi, I concur. Thanks, GerardM
On Sat, 15 May 2021 at 05:56, Sotiale Wiki sotiale.wm@gmail.com wrote:
I have been watching the activities of Wp/dag, and I think it is steady and stable. I believe that if there are no other issues, there will be no issues with approval.
Sotiale
본 이메일은 Avast로 보호되는 안전한 컴퓨터에서 발송되었습니다. www.avast.com https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail <#m_-7797216140833918237_DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
2021년 4월 26일 (월) 오전 9:21, MF-Warburg mfwarburg@googlemail.com님이 작성:
Looks good to me. I had an eye on it already but so far the most-used messages were always incomplete.
Am Sa., 24. Apr. 2021 um 19:09 Uhr schrieb Jon Harald Søby < jhsoby@gmail.com>:
Hi all,
I would like to propose the approval of the Dagbani Wikipedia. The activity [1] is really good and stable, and the most used messages have all been translated [2] (this was finished today actually – there were some 40ish untranslated messages a couple of days ago, so I prodded Sadik Shahadu, one of the main contributors, to complete them, and he responded very swiftly). The community is really active not only on the Incubator, but in various other areas of Wikimedia as well – as some of you may have heard, it was selected as one of the focus languages for the Abstract Wikipedia project [3]. In addition, they also have an active Wikimedia User Group [4], which I believe is the only language-based user group for a language that's still in the Incubator.
As for external validation, I am not sure that is necessary in this case, but according to Amir, who has been helping them out with some things, it should be rather easy to obtain if any of the committee members deem it necessary.
Maybe - especially in this case? ;)
[1] https://meta.toolforge.org/catanalysis/index.php?cat=0&title=Wp/dag&... [2] https://robin.toolforge.org/?tool=codelookup&code=dag [3] https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Lexicographical_data/Focus_languages [4] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Dagbani_Wikimedians_User_Group
-- mvh Jon Harald Søby _______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list -- langcom@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe send an email to langcom-leave@lists.wikimedia.org
Hi,
I've just forwarded an expert confirmation to the private list.
Let's go forward with this.
-- Amir Elisha Aharoni · אָמִיר אֱלִישָׁע אַהֲרוֹנִי http://aharoni.wordpress.com “We're living in pieces, I want to live in peace.” – T. Moore
בתאריך שבת, 24 באפר׳ 2021 ב-20:09 מאת Jon Harald Søby <jhsoby@gmail.com >:
Hi all,
I would like to propose the approval of the Dagbani Wikipedia. The activity [1] is really good and stable, and the most used messages have all been translated [2] (this was finished today actually – there were some 40ish untranslated messages a couple of days ago, so I prodded Sadik Shahadu, one of the main contributors, to complete them, and he responded very swiftly). The community is really active not only on the Incubator, but in various other areas of Wikimedia as well – as some of you may have heard, it was selected as one of the focus languages for the Abstract Wikipedia project [3]. In addition, they also have an active Wikimedia User Group [4], which I believe is the only language-based user group for a language that's still in the Incubator.
As for external validation, I am not sure that is necessary in this case, but according to Amir, who has been helping them out with some things, it should be rather easy to obtain if any of the committee members deem it necessary.
[1] https://meta.toolforge.org/catanalysis/index.php?cat=0&title=Wp/dag&... [2] https://robin.toolforge.org/?tool=codelookup&code=dag [3] https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Lexicographical_data/Focus_languages [4] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Dagbani_Wikimedians_User_Group
-- mvh Jon Harald Søby _______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Excellent, thanks.
Proceeding: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Language_committee#Notification_about_p...
Am Di., 1. Juni 2021 um 17:09 Uhr schrieb Amir E. Aharoni < amir.aharoni@mail.huji.ac.il>:
Hi,
I've just forwarded an expert confirmation to the private list.
Let's go forward with this.
-- Amir Elisha Aharoni · אָמִיר אֱלִישָׁע אַהֲרוֹנִי http://aharoni.wordpress.com “We're living in pieces, I want to live in peace.” – T. Moore
בתאריך שבת, 24 באפר׳ 2021 ב-20:09 מאת Jon Harald Søby < jhsoby@gmail.com>:
Hi all,
I would like to propose the approval of the Dagbani Wikipedia. The activity [1] is really good and stable, and the most used messages have all been translated [2] (this was finished today actually – there were some 40ish untranslated messages a couple of days ago, so I prodded Sadik Shahadu, one of the main contributors, to complete them, and he responded very swiftly). The community is really active not only on the Incubator, but in various other areas of Wikimedia as well – as some of you may have heard, it was selected as one of the focus languages for the Abstract Wikipedia project [3]. In addition, they also have an active Wikimedia User Group [4], which I believe is the only language-based user group for a language that's still in the Incubator.
As for external validation, I am not sure that is necessary in this case, but according to Amir, who has been helping them out with some things, it should be rather easy to obtain if any of the committee members deem it necessary.
[1] https://meta.toolforge.org/catanalysis/index.php?cat=0&title=Wp/dag&... [2] https://robin.toolforge.org/?tool=codelookup&code=dag [3] https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Lexicographical_data/Focus_languages [4] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Dagbani_Wikimedians_User_Group
-- mvh Jon Harald Søby _______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list -- langcom@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe send an email to langcom-leave@lists.wikimedia.org