Hoi, Alemannic is the problem here; it is outside of ISO 639 3 and only exists because it predates the language policy. In many ways it is the macro language discussion about inclusion all over again except that Alemannic is .. different. Thanks, GerardM
On 2 January 2018 at 23:35, Steven White Koala19890@hotmail.com wrote:
I promised I was going to keep old project requests moving along after the new year. So here are four:
Wikipedia Swabian https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikipedia_Swabian: Propose to reject. Although it has a language code, Swabian is already included within Alemannic Wikipedia. Starting initial seven-day clock on this now.
Wikipedia Manchu https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikipedia_Manchu_2 (on hold since March 2010, waiting for native speakers): Marking eligible. This project has been fairly active on Incubator recently, and the tool to allow the vertical Manchu script is working very nicely.
Wikipedia Kutchi https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikipedia_Kutchi: Marking eligible. Has a language code, and about 875,000 speakers in India and Pakistan.
Wikipedia Kumaoni https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikipedia_Kumaoni: Marking as "on hold". In principle, should be eligible. But there is no test project on Incubator, and most speakers are bilingual in Hindi. (It's not that these are mutually intelligible languages, just that Hindi is a lingua franca in the area.) So I'd like to place this on hold until someone comes who is interested in starting the project.
Steven
Sent from Outlook http://aka.ms/weboutlook
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom